Christopher Haster d5c0e142f0 scripts: Reworked tracebd.py, needs cleanup
It's a mess but it's working. Still a number of TODOs to cleanup...

This adopts all of the changes in dbgbmap.py/dbgbmapd3.py, block
grouping, nested curves, Canvas, Attrs, etc:

- Like dbgbmap.py, we now group by block first before applying space
  filling curves, using nested space filling curves to render byte-level
  operations.

  Python's ft.lru_cache really shines here.

  The previous behavior is still available via -u/--contiguous

- Adopted most features in dbgbmap.py, so --to-scale, -t/--tiny, custom
  --title strings, etc.

- Adopted Attrs so now chars/coloring can be customized with
  -./--add-char, -,/--add-wear-char, -C/--add-color,
  -G/--add-wear-color.

- Renamed -R/--reset -> --volatile, which is a much better name.

- Wear is now colored cyan -> white -> read, which is a bit more
  visually interesting. And we're not using cyan in any scripts yet.

In addition to the new stuff, there were a few simplifications:

- We no longer support sub-char -n/--lines with -:/--dots or
  -⣿/--braille. Too complicated, required Canvas state hacks to get
  working, and wasn't super useful.

  We probably want to avoid doing too much cleverness with -:/--dots and
  -⣿/--braille since we can't color sub-chars.

- Dropped -@/--blocks byte-level range stuff. This was just not worth
  the amount of complexity it added. -@/--blocks is now limited to
  simple block ranges. High-level scripts should stick to high-level
  options.

- No fancy/complicated Bmap class. The bmap object is just a dict of
  TraceBlocks which contain RangeSets for relevant operations.

  Actually the new RangeSet class deserves a mention but this commit
  message is probably already too long.

  RangeSet is a decently efficient set of, well, ranges, that can be
  merged and queried. In a lower-level language it should be implemented
  as a binary tree, but in Python we're just using a sorted list because
  we're probably not going to be able to beat O(n) list operations.

- Wear is tracked at the block level, no reason to overcomplicate this.

- We no longer resize based on new info. Instead we either expect a
  -b/--block-size argument or wait until first bd init call.

  We can probably drop the block size in BD_TRACE statements now, but
  that's a TODO item.

- Instead of one amalgamated regex, we use string searches to figure out
  the bd op and then smaller regexes to parse. Lesson learned here:
  Python's string search is very fast (compared to regex).

- We do _not_ support labels on blocks like we do in treemap.py/
  codemap.py. It's less useful here and would just be more hassle.

I also tried to reorganize main a bit to mirror the simple two-main
approach in dbgbmap.py and other ascii-rendering scripts, but it's a bit
difficult here since trace info is very stateful. Building up main
functions in the main main function seemed to work well enough:

  main -+-> main_ -> trace__ (main thread)
        '-> draw_ -> draw__ (daemon thread)

---

You may note some weirdness going on with flags. That's me trying to
avoid upcoming flag conflicts.

I think we want -n/--lines in more scripts, now that it's relatively
self-contained, but this conflicts with -n/--namespace-depth in
codemap[d3].py, and risks conflict with -N/--notes in csv.py which may
end up with namespace-related functionality in the future.

I ended up hijacking -_, but this conflicted with -_/--add-line-char in
plot.py, but that's ok because we also want a common "secondary char"
flag for wear in tracebd.py... Long story short I ended up moving a
bunch of flags around:

- added                   -n/--lines
- -n/--namespace-depth -> -_/--namespace-depth
- -N/--notes           -> -N/--notes
- -./--add-char        -> -./--add-char
- -_/--add-line-char   -> -,/--add-line-char
- added                   -,/--add-wear-char
- -C/--color           -> -C/--add-color
- added                -> -G/--add-wear-color

Worth it? Dunno.
2025-04-16 15:22:38 -05:00
2019-09-01 21:11:49 -07:00
2025-02-11 02:50:38 -06:00
2025-02-13 16:07:02 -06:00
2025-02-13 16:07:02 -06:00
2022-03-20 23:03:52 -05:00
2022-11-09 11:12:20 -06:00
2022-02-18 21:13:41 -06:00

littlefs

A little fail-safe filesystem designed for microcontrollers.

   | | |     .---._____
  .-----.   |          |
--|o    |---| littlefs |
--|     |---|          |
  '-----'   '----------'
   | | |

Power-loss resilience - littlefs is designed to handle random power failures. All file operations have strong copy-on-write guarantees and if power is lost the filesystem will fall back to the last known good state.

Dynamic wear leveling - littlefs is designed with flash in mind, and provides wear leveling over dynamic blocks. Additionally, littlefs can detect bad blocks and work around them.

Bounded RAM/ROM - littlefs is designed to work with a small amount of memory. RAM usage is strictly bounded, which means RAM consumption does not change as the filesystem grows. The filesystem contains no unbounded recursion and dynamic memory is limited to configurable buffers that can be provided statically.

Example

Here's a simple example that updates a file named boot_count every time main runs. The program can be interrupted at any time without losing track of how many times it has been booted and without corrupting the filesystem:

#include "lfs.h"

// variables used by the filesystem
lfs_t lfs;
lfs_file_t file;

// configuration of the filesystem is provided by this struct
const struct lfs_config cfg = {
    // block device operations
    .read  = user_provided_block_device_read,
    .prog  = user_provided_block_device_prog,
    .erase = user_provided_block_device_erase,
    .sync  = user_provided_block_device_sync,

    // block device configuration
    .read_size = 16,
    .prog_size = 16,
    .block_size = 4096,
    .block_count = 128,
    .cache_size = 16,
    .lookahead_size = 16,
    .block_cycles = 500,
};

// entry point
int main(void) {
    // mount the filesystem
    int err = lfs_mount(&lfs, &cfg);

    // reformat if we can't mount the filesystem
    // this should only happen on the first boot
    if (err) {
        lfs_format(&lfs, &cfg);
        lfs_mount(&lfs, &cfg);
    }

    // read current count
    uint32_t boot_count = 0;
    lfs_file_open(&lfs, &file, "boot_count", LFS_O_RDWR | LFS_O_CREAT);
    lfs_file_read(&lfs, &file, &boot_count, sizeof(boot_count));

    // update boot count
    boot_count += 1;
    lfs_file_rewind(&lfs, &file);
    lfs_file_write(&lfs, &file, &boot_count, sizeof(boot_count));

    // remember the storage is not updated until the file is closed successfully
    lfs_file_close(&lfs, &file);

    // release any resources we were using
    lfs_unmount(&lfs);

    // print the boot count
    printf("boot_count: %d\n", boot_count);
}

Usage

Detailed documentation (or at least as much detail as is currently available) can be found in the comments in lfs.h.

littlefs takes in a configuration structure that defines how the filesystem operates. The configuration struct provides the filesystem with the block device operations and dimensions, tweakable parameters that tradeoff memory usage for performance, and optional static buffers if the user wants to avoid dynamic memory.

The state of the littlefs is stored in the lfs_t type which is left up to the user to allocate, allowing multiple filesystems to be in use simultaneously. With the lfs_t and configuration struct, a user can format a block device or mount the filesystem.

Once mounted, the littlefs provides a full set of POSIX-like file and directory functions, with the deviation that the allocation of filesystem structures must be provided by the user.

All POSIX operations, such as remove and rename, are atomic, even in event of power-loss. Additionally, file updates are not actually committed to the filesystem until sync or close is called on the file.

Other notes

Littlefs is written in C, and specifically should compile with any compiler that conforms to the C99 standard.

All littlefs calls have the potential to return a negative error code. The errors can be either one of those found in the enum lfs_error in lfs.h, or an error returned by the user's block device operations.

In the configuration struct, the prog and erase function provided by the user may return a LFS_ERR_CORRUPT error if the implementation already can detect corrupt blocks. However, the wear leveling does not depend on the return code of these functions, instead all data is read back and checked for integrity.

If your storage caches writes, make sure that the provided sync function flushes all the data to memory and ensures that the next read fetches the data from memory, otherwise data integrity can not be guaranteed. If the write function does not perform caching, and therefore each read or write call hits the memory, the sync function can simply return 0.

Design

At a high level, littlefs is a block based filesystem that uses small logs to store metadata and larger copy-on-write (COW) structures to store file data.

In littlefs, these ingredients form a sort of two-layered cake, with the small logs (called metadata pairs) providing fast updates to metadata anywhere on storage, while the COW structures store file data compactly and without any wear amplification cost.

Both of these data structures are built out of blocks, which are fed by a common block allocator. By limiting the number of erases allowed on a block per allocation, the allocator provides dynamic wear leveling over the entire filesystem.

                    root
                   .--------.--------.
                   | A'| B'|         |
                   |   |   |->       |
                   |   |   |         |
                   '--------'--------'
                .----'   '--------------.
       A       v                 B       v
      .--------.--------.       .--------.--------.
      | C'| D'|         |       | E'|new|         |
      |   |   |->       |       |   | E'|->       |
      |   |   |         |       |   |   |         |
      '--------'--------'       '--------'--------'
      .-'   '--.                  |   '------------------.
     v          v              .-'                        v
.--------.  .--------.        v                       .--------.
|   C    |  |   D    |   .--------.       write       | new E  |
|        |  |        |   |   E    |        ==>        |        |
|        |  |        |   |        |                   |        |
'--------'  '--------'   |        |                   '--------'
                         '--------'                   .-'    |
                         .-'    '-.    .-------------|------'
                        v          v  v              v
                   .--------.  .--------.       .--------.
                   |   F    |  |   G    |       | new F  |
                   |        |  |        |       |        |
                   |        |  |        |       |        |
                   '--------'  '--------'       '--------'

More details on how littlefs works can be found in DESIGN.md and SPEC.md.

  • DESIGN.md - A fully detailed dive into how littlefs works. I would suggest reading it as the tradeoffs at work are quite interesting.

  • SPEC.md - The on-disk specification of littlefs with all the nitty-gritty details. May be useful for tooling development.

Testing

The littlefs comes with a test suite designed to run on a PC using the emulated block device found in the bd directory. The tests assume a Linux environment and can be started with make:

make test

License

The littlefs is provided under the BSD-3-Clause license. See LICENSE.md for more information. Contributions to this project are accepted under the same license.

Individual files contain the following tag instead of the full license text.

SPDX-License-Identifier:    BSD-3-Clause

This enables machine processing of license information based on the SPDX License Identifiers that are here available: http://spdx.org/licenses/

  • littlefs-fuse - A FUSE wrapper for littlefs. The project allows you to mount littlefs directly on a Linux machine. Can be useful for debugging littlefs if you have an SD card handy.

  • littlefs-js - A javascript wrapper for littlefs. I'm not sure why you would want this, but it is handy for demos. You can see it in action here.

  • littlefs-python - A Python wrapper for littlefs. The project allows you to create images of the filesystem on your PC. Check if littlefs will fit your needs, create images for a later download to the target memory or inspect the content of a binary image of the target memory.

  • mklfs - A command line tool built by the Lua RTOS guys for making littlefs images from a host PC. Supports Windows, Mac OS, and Linux.

  • Mbed OS - The easiest way to get started with littlefs is to jump into Mbed which already has block device drivers for most forms of embedded storage. littlefs is available in Mbed OS as the LittleFileSystem class.

  • SPIFFS - Another excellent embedded filesystem for NOR flash. As a more traditional logging filesystem with full static wear-leveling, SPIFFS will likely outperform littlefs on small memories such as the internal flash on microcontrollers.

  • Dhara - An interesting NAND flash translation layer designed for small MCUs. It offers static wear-leveling and power-resilience with only a fixed O(|address|) pointer structure stored on each block and in RAM.

S
Description
A little fail-safe filesystem designed for microcontrollers
https://github.com/littlefs-project/littlefs.git Readme 14 MiB
Languages
C 68.4%
Python 30.7%
Makefile 0.9%