Christopher Haster
ba505c2a37
"Scratch files" are a new file type added to solve the zero-sized
file problem. Though they have a few other uses that may be quite
valuable.
The "zero-sized file problem" is a common surprise for users, where what
seems like a simple file create+write operation:
lfs_file_open(&lfs, &file, "hi",
LFS_O_WRONLY | LFS_O_CREAT | LFS_O_EXCL);
lfs_file_write(&lfs, &file, "hello!", strlen("hello!"));
lfs_file_close(&lfs, &file);
Can end up create a zero-sized file under powerloss, breaking user
assumptions and their code.
The tricky thing is that this is actually correct behavior as defined by
POSIX. `open` with O_CREAT creats a file entry immediately, which is
initially zero-sized. And the fact that power can be lost between `open`
and `close` isn't really avoidable.
But this is a common enough footgun that it's probably worth deviating
from POSIX here.
But how to avoid zero-sized files exactly? First thought: Delay the file
creation until sync/close, tracking uncreated files in-device until
then. This solves the problem and avoids any intermediary state if we
lose power, but came with a number of headaches:
1. Since we delay file creation, we don't immediately write the filename
to disk on open. This implies we need to keep the filename allocated
in RAM until the first sync/close call.
The requirement to keep the filename allocated for new files until
first sync/close could be added to open, and with the option to call
sync immediately to save the filename (and accept the risk of
zero-sized files), I don't think it would be _that_ bad of an API.
But it would still be pretty bad. Extra bad because 1. there's no
way to warn on misuse at compile-time, 2. use-after-free bugs have a
tendency to go unnoticed annoyingly often, 3. it's a regression from
the previous API, and 4. who the heck reads the more-or-less same
`open` documentation for every filesystem they adopt.
2. Without an allocated mid, tracking files internally gets a lot
harder. The best option I could think of was to keep the opened-file
linked-list sorted by mid + (in-device) file name.
This did not feel like a great solutiona and was going to add more
code cost.
3. Handling mdir splits containing uncreated files adds another
headache. Complicated lfsr_mdir_estimate further as it needs to
decide in which mdir the uncreated files will end up, and potentially
split on a filename that isn't even created yet.
4. Since the number of uncreated files can be potentially unbounded, you
can't prevent an mdir from filling up with only uncreated files. On
disk this ends up looking like an "empty" mdir, which need specially
handling in littlefs to reclaim after powerloss.
Support for empty mdirs -- the orphaned mdir scan -- was already
added earlier. We already scan each mdir to build gstate, so it
doesn't really add much cost.
Notice that last bullet point? We already scan each mdir during mount.
Why not, instead of scanning for orphaned mdirs, scan for orphaned
files?
So this leads to the idea of "scratch files". Instead of actually
delaying file creation, fake it. Create a scratch file during open, and
on the first sync/close, convert it to a regular file. If we lose power,
scan for scratch files during mount, and remove them on first write.
Some tradeoffs:
1. The orphan scan for scratch files is a bit more expensive than for
mdirs on storage with large block sizes. We need to look at each file
entry vs just each mdir, which pushed the runtime up to O(BlogB) vs
O(B).
Though if you also consider large mtrees, the worst case is still
O(nlogn).
2. Creating intermediate scratch files adds another commit to file
creation.
This is probably not a big issue for flash, but may be more of a
concern on devices with large prog sizes.
3. Scratch files complicate unrelated mkdir/rename/etc code a bit, since
we need to consider what happens when the dest is a scratch file.
But the end result is simple. And simple is good. Both for
implementation headaches, and code size. Even if the on-disk state is
conceptually more complicated.
You may have noticed these scratch files are basically isomorphic to
just setting an "uncreated" flag on the file, and that's true. There may
have been a simpler route to end up with the design, but hey, as long as
it works.
As a plus, scratch files present a solution for a couple other things:
1. Removing an open file can become a scratch file until closed.
2. Scratch files can be used as temporary files. Open a file with
O_DESYNC and never call sync and you have yourself a temporary file.
Maybe in the future we should add O_TMPFILE to avoid the need for
unique filenames, but that is low priority.
littlefs
A little fail-safe filesystem designed for microcontrollers.
| | | .---._____
.-----. | |
--|o |---| littlefs |
--| |---| |
'-----' '----------'
| | |
Power-loss resilience - littlefs is designed to handle random power failures. All file operations have strong copy-on-write guarantees and if power is lost the filesystem will fall back to the last known good state.
Dynamic wear leveling - littlefs is designed with flash in mind, and provides wear leveling over dynamic blocks. Additionally, littlefs can detect bad blocks and work around them.
Bounded RAM/ROM - littlefs is designed to work with a small amount of memory. RAM usage is strictly bounded, which means RAM consumption does not change as the filesystem grows. The filesystem contains no unbounded recursion and dynamic memory is limited to configurable buffers that can be provided statically.
Example
Here's a simple example that updates a file named boot_count every time
main runs. The program can be interrupted at any time without losing track
of how many times it has been booted and without corrupting the filesystem:
#include "lfs.h"
// variables used by the filesystem
lfs_t lfs;
lfs_file_t file;
// configuration of the filesystem is provided by this struct
const struct lfs_config cfg = {
// block device operations
.read = user_provided_block_device_read,
.prog = user_provided_block_device_prog,
.erase = user_provided_block_device_erase,
.sync = user_provided_block_device_sync,
// block device configuration
.read_size = 16,
.prog_size = 16,
.block_size = 4096,
.block_count = 128,
.cache_size = 16,
.lookahead_size = 16,
.block_cycles = 500,
};
// entry point
int main(void) {
// mount the filesystem
int err = lfs_mount(&lfs, &cfg);
// reformat if we can't mount the filesystem
// this should only happen on the first boot
if (err) {
lfs_format(&lfs, &cfg);
lfs_mount(&lfs, &cfg);
}
// read current count
uint32_t boot_count = 0;
lfs_file_open(&lfs, &file, "boot_count", LFS_O_RDWR | LFS_O_CREAT);
lfs_file_read(&lfs, &file, &boot_count, sizeof(boot_count));
// update boot count
boot_count += 1;
lfs_file_rewind(&lfs, &file);
lfs_file_write(&lfs, &file, &boot_count, sizeof(boot_count));
// remember the storage is not updated until the file is closed successfully
lfs_file_close(&lfs, &file);
// release any resources we were using
lfs_unmount(&lfs);
// print the boot count
printf("boot_count: %d\n", boot_count);
}
Usage
Detailed documentation (or at least as much detail as is currently available) can be found in the comments in lfs.h.
littlefs takes in a configuration structure that defines how the filesystem operates. The configuration struct provides the filesystem with the block device operations and dimensions, tweakable parameters that tradeoff memory usage for performance, and optional static buffers if the user wants to avoid dynamic memory.
The state of the littlefs is stored in the lfs_t type which is left up
to the user to allocate, allowing multiple filesystems to be in use
simultaneously. With the lfs_t and configuration struct, a user can
format a block device or mount the filesystem.
Once mounted, the littlefs provides a full set of POSIX-like file and directory functions, with the deviation that the allocation of filesystem structures must be provided by the user.
All POSIX operations, such as remove and rename, are atomic, even in event of power-loss. Additionally, file updates are not actually committed to the filesystem until sync or close is called on the file.
Other notes
Littlefs is written in C, and specifically should compile with any compiler
that conforms to the C99 standard.
All littlefs calls have the potential to return a negative error code. The
errors can be either one of those found in the enum lfs_error in
lfs.h, or an error returned by the user's block device operations.
In the configuration struct, the prog and erase function provided by the
user may return a LFS_ERR_CORRUPT error if the implementation already can
detect corrupt blocks. However, the wear leveling does not depend on the return
code of these functions, instead all data is read back and checked for
integrity.
If your storage caches writes, make sure that the provided sync function
flushes all the data to memory and ensures that the next read fetches the data
from memory, otherwise data integrity can not be guaranteed. If the write
function does not perform caching, and therefore each read or write call
hits the memory, the sync function can simply return 0.
Design
At a high level, littlefs is a block based filesystem that uses small logs to store metadata and larger copy-on-write (COW) structures to store file data.
In littlefs, these ingredients form a sort of two-layered cake, with the small logs (called metadata pairs) providing fast updates to metadata anywhere on storage, while the COW structures store file data compactly and without any wear amplification cost.
Both of these data structures are built out of blocks, which are fed by a common block allocator. By limiting the number of erases allowed on a block per allocation, the allocator provides dynamic wear leveling over the entire filesystem.
root
.--------.--------.
| A'| B'| |
| | |-> |
| | | |
'--------'--------'
.----' '--------------.
A v B v
.--------.--------. .--------.--------.
| C'| D'| | | E'|new| |
| | |-> | | | E'|-> |
| | | | | | | |
'--------'--------' '--------'--------'
.-' '--. | '------------------.
v v .-' v
.--------. .--------. v .--------.
| C | | D | .--------. write | new E |
| | | | | E | ==> | |
| | | | | | | |
'--------' '--------' | | '--------'
'--------' .-' |
.-' '-. .-------------|------'
v v v v
.--------. .--------. .--------.
| F | | G | | new F |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
'--------' '--------' '--------'
More details on how littlefs works can be found in DESIGN.md and SPEC.md.
-
DESIGN.md - A fully detailed dive into how littlefs works. I would suggest reading it as the tradeoffs at work are quite interesting.
-
SPEC.md - The on-disk specification of littlefs with all the nitty-gritty details. May be useful for tooling development.
Testing
The littlefs comes with a test suite designed to run on a PC using the
emulated block device found in the bd directory.
The tests assume a Linux environment and can be started with make:
make test
License
The littlefs is provided under the BSD-3-Clause license. See LICENSE.md for more information. Contributions to this project are accepted under the same license.
Individual files contain the following tag instead of the full license text.
SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
This enables machine processing of license information based on the SPDX License Identifiers that are here available: http://spdx.org/licenses/
Related projects
-
littlefs-fuse - A FUSE wrapper for littlefs. The project allows you to mount littlefs directly on a Linux machine. Can be useful for debugging littlefs if you have an SD card handy.
-
littlefs-js - A javascript wrapper for littlefs. I'm not sure why you would want this, but it is handy for demos. You can see it in action here.
-
littlefs-python - A Python wrapper for littlefs. The project allows you to create images of the filesystem on your PC. Check if littlefs will fit your needs, create images for a later download to the target memory or inspect the content of a binary image of the target memory.
-
mklfs - A command line tool built by the Lua RTOS guys for making littlefs images from a host PC. Supports Windows, Mac OS, and Linux.
-
Mbed OS - The easiest way to get started with littlefs is to jump into Mbed which already has block device drivers for most forms of embedded storage. littlefs is available in Mbed OS as the LittleFileSystem class.
-
SPIFFS - Another excellent embedded filesystem for NOR flash. As a more traditional logging filesystem with full static wear-leveling, SPIFFS will likely outperform littlefs on small memories such as the internal flash on microcontrollers.
-
Dhara - An interesting NAND flash translation layer designed for small MCUs. It offers static wear-leveling and power-resilience with only a fixed O(|address|) pointer structure stored on each block and in RAM.