Christopher Haster b5a94f3397 gbmap: Added mkgbmap and rmgbmap for enabling/disabling the gbmap
These two functions allow changing whether or not the gbmap is in use
after format:

  // Enable the global on-disk block-map
  //
  // Returns a negative error code on failure. Does nothing if a gbmap
  // already exists.
  int lfs3_fs_mkgbmap(lfs3_t *lfs3);

  // Disable the global on-disk block-map
  //
  // Returns a negative error code on failure. Does nothing if no gbmap
  // is found.
  int lfs3_fs_rmgbmap(lfs3_t *lfs3);

rmgbmap was easy enough, but implementing mkgbmap turned out to be
surprisingly tricky due to how gstate permeates the system:

- Even if we zero gstate when we removing the gbmap, mounting the
  image on a driver that doesn't understand the gbmap results in garbage
  gstate over time as mdir compacts drop unknown gdeltas.

  I think this sort of implicit gdelta cleanup is a good thing, but the
  possibility of garbage gstate is a bit annoying.

  Example A: the dbg scripts are currently printing a bunch of warnings
  for corrupt gstate that can be safely ignored.

  To support recovering from garbage gstate in mkgbmap, I changed
  lfs3_fs_commitgdelta to _always_ track p state even when disabled. We
  already needed to do this in lfs3_fs_flush/consumegdelta anyways,
  since we don't know if the gbmap is used until parsing wcompat flags.

- The commit that enables the gbmap is tricky. We need the gbmap enabled
  to calculate the new gdelta, but we also need it disabled so we don't
  traverse the existing gbmap_p (which may be garbage).

  As a workaround I added gbmap.b_p, which is in theory redundant with
  gbmap_p, but (1) avoids needing to decode gbmap_p during traversals,
  and (2) allows the two to temporarily fall out-of-sync in mkgbmap.

  This means we potentially have 5 (!) snaphots flying around when
  rebuilding the gbmap, which is starting to get a bit silly. But this
  was also motivated by gbmap_p decoding adding roughly the same amount
  of RAM to lfs3_mtree_traverse_, so the total RAM usage should in
  theory be roughly the same.

  There might be a better solution, but this at least gets mkgbmap
  working. The gbmap builds are not our most RAM senstive configurations
  anyways.

---

Also added a couple more tests in test_gbmap to test these:

- test_gbmap_files
- test_gbmap_rmgbmap
- test_gbmap_mkgbmap
- test_gbmap_rmmkgbmap
- test_gbmap_mkrmgbmap

And an explicit wraparound test to test_alloc. This was loosely implied
by the nospc tests, but it's probably better to have an explicit test.
The only downside is this implementation is limited to files:

- test_alloc_wraparound_files

---

Note we are currently dealing with three different configurations:
no-gbmap (the default), yes-gbmap (LFS3_YES_GBMAP), and maybe-gbmap
(LFS3_GBMAP + LFS3_F_GBMAP at runtime).

It only makes sense to include these in maybe-gbmap mode, so this is the
only mode with a notable code increase. However these functions are
relatively cheap. The stack/ctx changes also affect yes-gbmap, but
should mostly cancel out, see above:

                       code          stack          ctx
  no-gbmap before:    37168           2352          684
  no-gbmap after:     37168 (+0.0%)   2352 (+0.0%)  684 (+0.0%)

                       code          stack          ctx
  maybe-gbmap before: 39292           2456          800
  maybe-gbmap after:  39688 (+1.0%)   2392 (-2.6%)  852 (+6.5%)

                       code          stack          ctx
  yes-gbmap before:   39116           2456          800
  yes-gbmap after:    39156 (+0.1%)   2392 (-2.6%)  852 (+6.5%)
2025-10-17 14:02:05 -05:00
2019-09-01 21:11:49 -07:00
2022-03-20 23:03:52 -05:00
2022-11-09 11:12:20 -06:00
2022-02-18 21:13:41 -06:00

littlefs

A little fail-safe filesystem designed for microcontrollers.

   | | |     .---._____
  .-----.   |          |
--|o    |---| littlefs |
--|     |---|          |
  '-----'   '----------'
   | | |

Power-loss resilience - littlefs is designed to handle random power failures. All file operations have strong copy-on-write guarantees and if power is lost the filesystem will fall back to the last known good state.

Dynamic wear leveling - littlefs is designed with flash in mind, and provides wear leveling over dynamic blocks. Additionally, littlefs can detect bad blocks and work around them.

Bounded RAM/ROM - littlefs is designed to work with a small amount of memory. RAM usage is strictly bounded, which means RAM consumption does not change as the filesystem grows. The filesystem contains no unbounded recursion and dynamic memory is limited to configurable buffers that can be provided statically.

Example

Here's a simple example that updates a file named boot_count every time main runs. The program can be interrupted at any time without losing track of how many times it has been booted and without corrupting the filesystem:

#include "lfs.h"

// variables used by the filesystem
lfs_t lfs;
lfs_file_t file;

// configuration of the filesystem is provided by this struct
const struct lfs_config cfg = {
    // block device operations
    .read  = user_provided_block_device_read,
    .prog  = user_provided_block_device_prog,
    .erase = user_provided_block_device_erase,
    .sync  = user_provided_block_device_sync,

    // block device configuration
    .read_size = 16,
    .prog_size = 16,
    .block_size = 4096,
    .block_count = 128,
    .cache_size = 16,
    .lookahead_size = 16,
    .block_cycles = 500,
};

// entry point
int main(void) {
    // mount the filesystem
    int err = lfs_mount(&lfs, &cfg);

    // reformat if we can't mount the filesystem
    // this should only happen on the first boot
    if (err) {
        lfs_format(&lfs, &cfg);
        lfs_mount(&lfs, &cfg);
    }

    // read current count
    uint32_t boot_count = 0;
    lfs_file_open(&lfs, &file, "boot_count", LFS_O_RDWR | LFS_O_CREAT);
    lfs_file_read(&lfs, &file, &boot_count, sizeof(boot_count));

    // update boot count
    boot_count += 1;
    lfs_file_rewind(&lfs, &file);
    lfs_file_write(&lfs, &file, &boot_count, sizeof(boot_count));

    // remember the storage is not updated until the file is closed successfully
    lfs_file_close(&lfs, &file);

    // release any resources we were using
    lfs_unmount(&lfs);

    // print the boot count
    printf("boot_count: %d\n", boot_count);
}

Usage

Detailed documentation (or at least as much detail as is currently available) can be found in the comments in lfs.h.

littlefs takes in a configuration structure that defines how the filesystem operates. The configuration struct provides the filesystem with the block device operations and dimensions, tweakable parameters that tradeoff memory usage for performance, and optional static buffers if the user wants to avoid dynamic memory.

The state of the littlefs is stored in the lfs_t type which is left up to the user to allocate, allowing multiple filesystems to be in use simultaneously. With the lfs_t and configuration struct, a user can format a block device or mount the filesystem.

Once mounted, the littlefs provides a full set of POSIX-like file and directory functions, with the deviation that the allocation of filesystem structures must be provided by the user.

All POSIX operations, such as remove and rename, are atomic, even in event of power-loss. Additionally, file updates are not actually committed to the filesystem until sync or close is called on the file.

Other notes

Littlefs is written in C, and specifically should compile with any compiler that conforms to the C99 standard.

All littlefs calls have the potential to return a negative error code. The errors can be either one of those found in the enum lfs_error in lfs.h, or an error returned by the user's block device operations.

In the configuration struct, the prog and erase function provided by the user may return a LFS_ERR_CORRUPT error if the implementation already can detect corrupt blocks. However, the wear leveling does not depend on the return code of these functions, instead all data is read back and checked for integrity.

If your storage caches writes, make sure that the provided sync function flushes all the data to memory and ensures that the next read fetches the data from memory, otherwise data integrity can not be guaranteed. If the write function does not perform caching, and therefore each read or write call hits the memory, the sync function can simply return 0.

Design

At a high level, littlefs is a block based filesystem that uses small logs to store metadata and larger copy-on-write (COW) structures to store file data.

In littlefs, these ingredients form a sort of two-layered cake, with the small logs (called metadata pairs) providing fast updates to metadata anywhere on storage, while the COW structures store file data compactly and without any wear amplification cost.

Both of these data structures are built out of blocks, which are fed by a common block allocator. By limiting the number of erases allowed on a block per allocation, the allocator provides dynamic wear leveling over the entire filesystem.

                    root
                   .--------.--------.
                   | A'| B'|         |
                   |   |   |->       |
                   |   |   |         |
                   '--------'--------'
                .----'   '--------------.
       A       v                 B       v
      .--------.--------.       .--------.--------.
      | C'| D'|         |       | E'|new|         |
      |   |   |->       |       |   | E'|->       |
      |   |   |         |       |   |   |         |
      '--------'--------'       '--------'--------'
      .-'   '--.                  |   '------------------.
     v          v              .-'                        v
.--------.  .--------.        v                       .--------.
|   C    |  |   D    |   .--------.       write       | new E  |
|        |  |        |   |   E    |        ==>        |        |
|        |  |        |   |        |                   |        |
'--------'  '--------'   |        |                   '--------'
                         '--------'                   .-'    |
                         .-'    '-.    .-------------|------'
                        v          v  v              v
                   .--------.  .--------.       .--------.
                   |   F    |  |   G    |       | new F  |
                   |        |  |        |       |        |
                   |        |  |        |       |        |
                   '--------'  '--------'       '--------'

More details on how littlefs works can be found in DESIGN.md and SPEC.md.

  • DESIGN.md - A fully detailed dive into how littlefs works. I would suggest reading it as the tradeoffs at work are quite interesting.

  • SPEC.md - The on-disk specification of littlefs with all the nitty-gritty details. May be useful for tooling development.

Testing

The littlefs comes with a test suite designed to run on a PC using the emulated block device found in the bd directory. The tests assume a Linux environment and can be started with make:

make test

License

The littlefs is provided under the BSD-3-Clause license. See LICENSE.md for more information. Contributions to this project are accepted under the same license.

Individual files contain the following tag instead of the full license text.

SPDX-License-Identifier:    BSD-3-Clause

This enables machine processing of license information based on the SPDX License Identifiers that are here available: http://spdx.org/licenses/

  • littlefs-fuse - A FUSE wrapper for littlefs. The project allows you to mount littlefs directly on a Linux machine. Can be useful for debugging littlefs if you have an SD card handy.

  • littlefs-js - A javascript wrapper for littlefs. I'm not sure why you would want this, but it is handy for demos. You can see it in action here.

  • littlefs-python - A Python wrapper for littlefs. The project allows you to create images of the filesystem on your PC. Check if littlefs will fit your needs, create images for a later download to the target memory or inspect the content of a binary image of the target memory.

  • mklfs - A command line tool built by the Lua RTOS guys for making littlefs images from a host PC. Supports Windows, Mac OS, and Linux.

  • Mbed OS - The easiest way to get started with littlefs is to jump into Mbed which already has block device drivers for most forms of embedded storage. littlefs is available in Mbed OS as the LittleFileSystem class.

  • SPIFFS - Another excellent embedded filesystem for NOR flash. As a more traditional logging filesystem with full static wear-leveling, SPIFFS will likely outperform littlefs on small memories such as the internal flash on microcontrollers.

  • Dhara - An interesting NAND flash translation layer designed for small MCUs. It offers static wear-leveling and power-resilience with only a fixed O(|address|) pointer structure stored on each block and in RAM.

S
Description
A little fail-safe filesystem designed for microcontrollers
https://github.com/littlefs-project/littlefs.git Readme 14 MiB
Languages
C 68.4%
Python 30.7%
Makefile 0.9%