Christopher Haster 4d86c90f1b t: Dropped LFS_T_EXCL/LFS_I_DIRTY
The tests highlighted that the LFS_I_DIRTY flag in lfsr_tinfo approach
is insufficient. Consider what happens if our filesystem is mutated
while traversing the last mdir:

1. Traversal traverses last mdir, populate blocks, return first block

2. Filesystem mutated, maybe mdir was compacted, clobbers traversal and
   sets LFS_I_DIRTY

3. Traversal return LFS_ERR_NOENT immediately, last block never
   returned (and out of date), LFS_I_DIRTY never returned

Not only do we miss the LFS_I_DIRTY flag, but we completely miss the
last block in the mdir pair without any warning.

This is _not_ a problem for the actual lookahead buffer, since we still
internally check the LFS_I_DIRTY flag before marking it as complete, but
it is an issue for any external logic that depends on the traversal
being complete...

---

We could revert to LFS_T_EXCL, but, to be honest, I just really don't
know a good name for this flag...

LFS_T_EXCL is a bad name because it conflicts with LFS_O_EXCL. These
flags have very different behaviors, which risks confusing users, and
risks potential name conflicts down the line if we ever want
LFS_T_EXCL-esque semantics for open dirs/files (not unreasonable, though
quite fancy).

My current best contender is LFS_T_WATCH, but while scratching my head
on this, I starting to wonder why we're even providing LFS_T_EXCL in the
first place...

We err on the side of forcing users to implement filesystem-external
features themselves when possible elsewhere, and LFS_T_EXCL technically
_can_ be implemented entirely outside of the filesystem. Though to be
fair it is quite annoying/tedious.

It's not like there's any equivalent feature for dir/file reads anyways.
And a background thread calling lfsr_traversal_read with LFS_T_LOOKAHEAD
will still _eventually_ make progress, even if it takes a bit longer.

Don't get me wrong, I understand it is significantly easier to implement
this inside the filesystem than outside. But it's also easier to
implement this later than right now. And if we implement this later,
hopefully we'll have a better idea what exactly will be useful for
users.

---

Removing LFS_T_EXCL/LFS_I_DIRTY has no real impact on code cost. We were
really just exposing internal logic that we need for lookahead
correctness anyways:

           code          stack
  before: 35224           2680
  after:  35220 (-0.0%)   2680 (+0.0%)
2024-07-08 08:59:26 -05:00
2024-07-08 08:59:26 -05:00
2019-09-01 21:11:49 -07:00
2024-06-20 13:04:25 -05:00
2024-07-08 08:59:26 -05:00
2024-07-08 08:59:26 -05:00
2022-03-20 23:03:52 -05:00
2024-06-02 19:19:46 -05:00
2022-11-09 11:12:20 -06:00
2022-02-18 21:13:41 -06:00

littlefs

A little fail-safe filesystem designed for microcontrollers.

   | | |     .---._____
  .-----.   |          |
--|o    |---| littlefs |
--|     |---|          |
  '-----'   '----------'
   | | |

Power-loss resilience - littlefs is designed to handle random power failures. All file operations have strong copy-on-write guarantees and if power is lost the filesystem will fall back to the last known good state.

Dynamic wear leveling - littlefs is designed with flash in mind, and provides wear leveling over dynamic blocks. Additionally, littlefs can detect bad blocks and work around them.

Bounded RAM/ROM - littlefs is designed to work with a small amount of memory. RAM usage is strictly bounded, which means RAM consumption does not change as the filesystem grows. The filesystem contains no unbounded recursion and dynamic memory is limited to configurable buffers that can be provided statically.

Example

Here's a simple example that updates a file named boot_count every time main runs. The program can be interrupted at any time without losing track of how many times it has been booted and without corrupting the filesystem:

#include "lfs.h"

// variables used by the filesystem
lfs_t lfs;
lfs_file_t file;

// configuration of the filesystem is provided by this struct
const struct lfs_config cfg = {
    // block device operations
    .read  = user_provided_block_device_read,
    .prog  = user_provided_block_device_prog,
    .erase = user_provided_block_device_erase,
    .sync  = user_provided_block_device_sync,

    // block device configuration
    .read_size = 16,
    .prog_size = 16,
    .block_size = 4096,
    .block_count = 128,
    .cache_size = 16,
    .lookahead_size = 16,
    .block_cycles = 500,
};

// entry point
int main(void) {
    // mount the filesystem
    int err = lfs_mount(&lfs, &cfg);

    // reformat if we can't mount the filesystem
    // this should only happen on the first boot
    if (err) {
        lfs_format(&lfs, &cfg);
        lfs_mount(&lfs, &cfg);
    }

    // read current count
    uint32_t boot_count = 0;
    lfs_file_open(&lfs, &file, "boot_count", LFS_O_RDWR | LFS_O_CREAT);
    lfs_file_read(&lfs, &file, &boot_count, sizeof(boot_count));

    // update boot count
    boot_count += 1;
    lfs_file_rewind(&lfs, &file);
    lfs_file_write(&lfs, &file, &boot_count, sizeof(boot_count));

    // remember the storage is not updated until the file is closed successfully
    lfs_file_close(&lfs, &file);

    // release any resources we were using
    lfs_unmount(&lfs);

    // print the boot count
    printf("boot_count: %d\n", boot_count);
}

Usage

Detailed documentation (or at least as much detail as is currently available) can be found in the comments in lfs.h.

littlefs takes in a configuration structure that defines how the filesystem operates. The configuration struct provides the filesystem with the block device operations and dimensions, tweakable parameters that tradeoff memory usage for performance, and optional static buffers if the user wants to avoid dynamic memory.

The state of the littlefs is stored in the lfs_t type which is left up to the user to allocate, allowing multiple filesystems to be in use simultaneously. With the lfs_t and configuration struct, a user can format a block device or mount the filesystem.

Once mounted, the littlefs provides a full set of POSIX-like file and directory functions, with the deviation that the allocation of filesystem structures must be provided by the user.

All POSIX operations, such as remove and rename, are atomic, even in event of power-loss. Additionally, file updates are not actually committed to the filesystem until sync or close is called on the file.

Other notes

Littlefs is written in C, and specifically should compile with any compiler that conforms to the C99 standard.

All littlefs calls have the potential to return a negative error code. The errors can be either one of those found in the enum lfs_error in lfs.h, or an error returned by the user's block device operations.

In the configuration struct, the prog and erase function provided by the user may return a LFS_ERR_CORRUPT error if the implementation already can detect corrupt blocks. However, the wear leveling does not depend on the return code of these functions, instead all data is read back and checked for integrity.

If your storage caches writes, make sure that the provided sync function flushes all the data to memory and ensures that the next read fetches the data from memory, otherwise data integrity can not be guaranteed. If the write function does not perform caching, and therefore each read or write call hits the memory, the sync function can simply return 0.

Design

At a high level, littlefs is a block based filesystem that uses small logs to store metadata and larger copy-on-write (COW) structures to store file data.

In littlefs, these ingredients form a sort of two-layered cake, with the small logs (called metadata pairs) providing fast updates to metadata anywhere on storage, while the COW structures store file data compactly and without any wear amplification cost.

Both of these data structures are built out of blocks, which are fed by a common block allocator. By limiting the number of erases allowed on a block per allocation, the allocator provides dynamic wear leveling over the entire filesystem.

                    root
                   .--------.--------.
                   | A'| B'|         |
                   |   |   |->       |
                   |   |   |         |
                   '--------'--------'
                .----'   '--------------.
       A       v                 B       v
      .--------.--------.       .--------.--------.
      | C'| D'|         |       | E'|new|         |
      |   |   |->       |       |   | E'|->       |
      |   |   |         |       |   |   |         |
      '--------'--------'       '--------'--------'
      .-'   '--.                  |   '------------------.
     v          v              .-'                        v
.--------.  .--------.        v                       .--------.
|   C    |  |   D    |   .--------.       write       | new E  |
|        |  |        |   |   E    |        ==>        |        |
|        |  |        |   |        |                   |        |
'--------'  '--------'   |        |                   '--------'
                         '--------'                   .-'    |
                         .-'    '-.    .-------------|------'
                        v          v  v              v
                   .--------.  .--------.       .--------.
                   |   F    |  |   G    |       | new F  |
                   |        |  |        |       |        |
                   |        |  |        |       |        |
                   '--------'  '--------'       '--------'

More details on how littlefs works can be found in DESIGN.md and SPEC.md.

  • DESIGN.md - A fully detailed dive into how littlefs works. I would suggest reading it as the tradeoffs at work are quite interesting.

  • SPEC.md - The on-disk specification of littlefs with all the nitty-gritty details. May be useful for tooling development.

Testing

The littlefs comes with a test suite designed to run on a PC using the emulated block device found in the bd directory. The tests assume a Linux environment and can be started with make:

make test

License

The littlefs is provided under the BSD-3-Clause license. See LICENSE.md for more information. Contributions to this project are accepted under the same license.

Individual files contain the following tag instead of the full license text.

SPDX-License-Identifier:    BSD-3-Clause

This enables machine processing of license information based on the SPDX License Identifiers that are here available: http://spdx.org/licenses/

  • littlefs-fuse - A FUSE wrapper for littlefs. The project allows you to mount littlefs directly on a Linux machine. Can be useful for debugging littlefs if you have an SD card handy.

  • littlefs-js - A javascript wrapper for littlefs. I'm not sure why you would want this, but it is handy for demos. You can see it in action here.

  • littlefs-python - A Python wrapper for littlefs. The project allows you to create images of the filesystem on your PC. Check if littlefs will fit your needs, create images for a later download to the target memory or inspect the content of a binary image of the target memory.

  • mklfs - A command line tool built by the Lua RTOS guys for making littlefs images from a host PC. Supports Windows, Mac OS, and Linux.

  • Mbed OS - The easiest way to get started with littlefs is to jump into Mbed which already has block device drivers for most forms of embedded storage. littlefs is available in Mbed OS as the LittleFileSystem class.

  • SPIFFS - Another excellent embedded filesystem for NOR flash. As a more traditional logging filesystem with full static wear-leveling, SPIFFS will likely outperform littlefs on small memories such as the internal flash on microcontrollers.

  • Dhara - An interesting NAND flash translation layer designed for small MCUs. It offers static wear-leveling and power-resilience with only a fixed O(|address|) pointer structure stored on each block and in RAM.

S
Description
A little fail-safe filesystem designed for microcontrollers
https://github.com/littlefs-project/littlefs.git Readme 14 MiB
Languages
C 68.4%
Python 30.7%
Makefile 0.9%