Christopher Haster 0e658b8246 scripts: Attempted reimp of stack.py using dwarf variable tags
Problem: I misunderstood the purpose of .debug_frames (objdump
--dwarf=frames).

The purpose of .debug_frames is not to record the size of function
stack frames, but to only tell a debugger how to access the previous
function's stack frame. It just so happens that this _coincidentally_
tells you the stack frame size when compiling with -fomit-frame-pointer.

With -fno-omit-frame-pointer (common on some archs), .debug_frames just
says "hey here's the frame pointer" (DW_CFA_def_cfa_register), which
tells us nothing about the function's actual stack usage.

So unfortunately .debug_frames does not provide enough info on its
own...

---

This commit was an attempt to find the actual stack usage by looking at
the relevant variable info (DW_TAG_variable, etc) in function's dwarf
info, but this approach is also not looking very good...

1. The numbers do not appear correct:

     before -fcallgraph-info=su:         2720
     after --dwarf=info:                 3558
     after --dwarf=info --no-shrinkwrap: 3922

     (this is with -fno-omit-frame-pointer)

   In hindsight, this approach is fundamentally flawed. While the
   variable tags does give us a lower bound on stack usage, it doesn't
   tell us about implicit compiler variables and various stack push/pops
   as a part of expression evaluation.

   As far as I can tell there's simply not enough info in dwarf info to
   find an accurate upper bound on stack usage.

2. This approach is quite a bit more complicated, since we need:

   1. Dwarf info (--dwarf=info) to find variable tags.
   2. Location info (--dwarf=loc) to map var allocations to address
      ranges.
   3. Range info (--dwarf=Ranges) to map lexical blocks to address
      ranges when var allocation is implicit (not implemented).
   4. And we still need frame info (--dwarf=frames)! since var
      allocations are frame-relative.

3. Also dwarf info is not guaranteed to contain the whole callgraph.

   It seems callgraph info is actually _omitted_ with -O0??

   I guess this is because the callgraph info is a side-effect of some
   compiler pass? This seems a bit backwards.

   Dwarf does have a flag (DW_AT_call_all_calls) to indicate when
   callgraph info is complete, but it doesn't seem to be set reliably?

   Even with optimizations, lfsr_bd_sync, _and only lfsr_bd_sync_, is
   missing the DW_AT_call_all_calls flag. I have no idea why. The flag
   is still present in lfsr_bd_erase, lfsr_bd_read, and other functions
   with function pointers...

So I think this will probably be reverted.
2024-12-16 18:01:47 -06:00
2024-08-23 12:54:27 -05:00
2019-09-01 21:11:49 -07:00
2024-08-20 00:32:00 -05:00
2024-08-23 12:54:27 -05:00
2024-08-23 12:54:27 -05:00
2022-03-20 23:03:52 -05:00
2022-11-09 11:12:20 -06:00
2022-02-18 21:13:41 -06:00

littlefs

A little fail-safe filesystem designed for microcontrollers.

   | | |     .---._____
  .-----.   |          |
--|o    |---| littlefs |
--|     |---|          |
  '-----'   '----------'
   | | |

Power-loss resilience - littlefs is designed to handle random power failures. All file operations have strong copy-on-write guarantees and if power is lost the filesystem will fall back to the last known good state.

Dynamic wear leveling - littlefs is designed with flash in mind, and provides wear leveling over dynamic blocks. Additionally, littlefs can detect bad blocks and work around them.

Bounded RAM/ROM - littlefs is designed to work with a small amount of memory. RAM usage is strictly bounded, which means RAM consumption does not change as the filesystem grows. The filesystem contains no unbounded recursion and dynamic memory is limited to configurable buffers that can be provided statically.

Example

Here's a simple example that updates a file named boot_count every time main runs. The program can be interrupted at any time without losing track of how many times it has been booted and without corrupting the filesystem:

#include "lfs.h"

// variables used by the filesystem
lfs_t lfs;
lfs_file_t file;

// configuration of the filesystem is provided by this struct
const struct lfs_config cfg = {
    // block device operations
    .read  = user_provided_block_device_read,
    .prog  = user_provided_block_device_prog,
    .erase = user_provided_block_device_erase,
    .sync  = user_provided_block_device_sync,

    // block device configuration
    .read_size = 16,
    .prog_size = 16,
    .block_size = 4096,
    .block_count = 128,
    .cache_size = 16,
    .lookahead_size = 16,
    .block_cycles = 500,
};

// entry point
int main(void) {
    // mount the filesystem
    int err = lfs_mount(&lfs, &cfg);

    // reformat if we can't mount the filesystem
    // this should only happen on the first boot
    if (err) {
        lfs_format(&lfs, &cfg);
        lfs_mount(&lfs, &cfg);
    }

    // read current count
    uint32_t boot_count = 0;
    lfs_file_open(&lfs, &file, "boot_count", LFS_O_RDWR | LFS_O_CREAT);
    lfs_file_read(&lfs, &file, &boot_count, sizeof(boot_count));

    // update boot count
    boot_count += 1;
    lfs_file_rewind(&lfs, &file);
    lfs_file_write(&lfs, &file, &boot_count, sizeof(boot_count));

    // remember the storage is not updated until the file is closed successfully
    lfs_file_close(&lfs, &file);

    // release any resources we were using
    lfs_unmount(&lfs);

    // print the boot count
    printf("boot_count: %d\n", boot_count);
}

Usage

Detailed documentation (or at least as much detail as is currently available) can be found in the comments in lfs.h.

littlefs takes in a configuration structure that defines how the filesystem operates. The configuration struct provides the filesystem with the block device operations and dimensions, tweakable parameters that tradeoff memory usage for performance, and optional static buffers if the user wants to avoid dynamic memory.

The state of the littlefs is stored in the lfs_t type which is left up to the user to allocate, allowing multiple filesystems to be in use simultaneously. With the lfs_t and configuration struct, a user can format a block device or mount the filesystem.

Once mounted, the littlefs provides a full set of POSIX-like file and directory functions, with the deviation that the allocation of filesystem structures must be provided by the user.

All POSIX operations, such as remove and rename, are atomic, even in event of power-loss. Additionally, file updates are not actually committed to the filesystem until sync or close is called on the file.

Other notes

Littlefs is written in C, and specifically should compile with any compiler that conforms to the C99 standard.

All littlefs calls have the potential to return a negative error code. The errors can be either one of those found in the enum lfs_error in lfs.h, or an error returned by the user's block device operations.

In the configuration struct, the prog and erase function provided by the user may return a LFS_ERR_CORRUPT error if the implementation already can detect corrupt blocks. However, the wear leveling does not depend on the return code of these functions, instead all data is read back and checked for integrity.

If your storage caches writes, make sure that the provided sync function flushes all the data to memory and ensures that the next read fetches the data from memory, otherwise data integrity can not be guaranteed. If the write function does not perform caching, and therefore each read or write call hits the memory, the sync function can simply return 0.

Design

At a high level, littlefs is a block based filesystem that uses small logs to store metadata and larger copy-on-write (COW) structures to store file data.

In littlefs, these ingredients form a sort of two-layered cake, with the small logs (called metadata pairs) providing fast updates to metadata anywhere on storage, while the COW structures store file data compactly and without any wear amplification cost.

Both of these data structures are built out of blocks, which are fed by a common block allocator. By limiting the number of erases allowed on a block per allocation, the allocator provides dynamic wear leveling over the entire filesystem.

                    root
                   .--------.--------.
                   | A'| B'|         |
                   |   |   |->       |
                   |   |   |         |
                   '--------'--------'
                .----'   '--------------.
       A       v                 B       v
      .--------.--------.       .--------.--------.
      | C'| D'|         |       | E'|new|         |
      |   |   |->       |       |   | E'|->       |
      |   |   |         |       |   |   |         |
      '--------'--------'       '--------'--------'
      .-'   '--.                  |   '------------------.
     v          v              .-'                        v
.--------.  .--------.        v                       .--------.
|   C    |  |   D    |   .--------.       write       | new E  |
|        |  |        |   |   E    |        ==>        |        |
|        |  |        |   |        |                   |        |
'--------'  '--------'   |        |                   '--------'
                         '--------'                   .-'    |
                         .-'    '-.    .-------------|------'
                        v          v  v              v
                   .--------.  .--------.       .--------.
                   |   F    |  |   G    |       | new F  |
                   |        |  |        |       |        |
                   |        |  |        |       |        |
                   '--------'  '--------'       '--------'

More details on how littlefs works can be found in DESIGN.md and SPEC.md.

  • DESIGN.md - A fully detailed dive into how littlefs works. I would suggest reading it as the tradeoffs at work are quite interesting.

  • SPEC.md - The on-disk specification of littlefs with all the nitty-gritty details. May be useful for tooling development.

Testing

The littlefs comes with a test suite designed to run on a PC using the emulated block device found in the bd directory. The tests assume a Linux environment and can be started with make:

make test

License

The littlefs is provided under the BSD-3-Clause license. See LICENSE.md for more information. Contributions to this project are accepted under the same license.

Individual files contain the following tag instead of the full license text.

SPDX-License-Identifier:    BSD-3-Clause

This enables machine processing of license information based on the SPDX License Identifiers that are here available: http://spdx.org/licenses/

  • littlefs-fuse - A FUSE wrapper for littlefs. The project allows you to mount littlefs directly on a Linux machine. Can be useful for debugging littlefs if you have an SD card handy.

  • littlefs-js - A javascript wrapper for littlefs. I'm not sure why you would want this, but it is handy for demos. You can see it in action here.

  • littlefs-python - A Python wrapper for littlefs. The project allows you to create images of the filesystem on your PC. Check if littlefs will fit your needs, create images for a later download to the target memory or inspect the content of a binary image of the target memory.

  • mklfs - A command line tool built by the Lua RTOS guys for making littlefs images from a host PC. Supports Windows, Mac OS, and Linux.

  • Mbed OS - The easiest way to get started with littlefs is to jump into Mbed which already has block device drivers for most forms of embedded storage. littlefs is available in Mbed OS as the LittleFileSystem class.

  • SPIFFS - Another excellent embedded filesystem for NOR flash. As a more traditional logging filesystem with full static wear-leveling, SPIFFS will likely outperform littlefs on small memories such as the internal flash on microcontrollers.

  • Dhara - An interesting NAND flash translation layer designed for small MCUs. It offers static wear-leveling and power-resilience with only a fixed O(|address|) pointer structure stored on each block and in RAM.

S
Description
A little fail-safe filesystem designed for microcontrollers
https://github.com/littlefs-project/littlefs.git Readme 14 MiB
Languages
C 68.4%
Python 30.7%
Makefile 0.9%