There's a bit of a push and pull when it comes to typechecking CSV
fields in our scripts. On one hand, we want the flexibility to accepts
scripts with various mismatched fields, on the other hand, we _really_
want to know if a typo caused a field to be quietly replaced with all
zeros...
I _think_ it's safe to say: if no fields across _all_ input files match
a requested field, we should error.
But I may end up wrong about this. Worst case we can always revert in
the future, maybe with an explicit flag to ignore missing fields.
Christopher Haster
f31f3fdd68