LFS_WCOMPAT_RDONLY seems generally useful for tools that just want to
mark a filesystem is read-only. This is a common flag that exists in
other filesystems (RO_COMPAT_READONLY in ext4 for example).
LFS_RCOMPAT_WRONLY, on the other hand, is a bit more of a joke, but
there could be some niche use cases for it (preventing double mounts?).
Fortunately, these flags require no extra code, and fall out naturally
from our wcompat/rcompat handling.
---
Originally, the idea was to also add LFS_F_RDONLY, to match LFS_M_RDONLY
and set the LFS_WCOMPAT_RDONLY flag during format.
But this doesn't really work with the current API, since lfsr_format
would just give you an empty filesystem you can't write to. Which is a
bit silly.
Maybe we should add something like lfsr_fs_mkrdonly in the future? This
is probably low-priority.
Christopher Haster
0cab73730e