Now that gcksums are working and we can detect rollback issues, it's
worth revisiting our most aggressive bit-error tests.
Unfortunately, I think due to focusing on ckprogs, these were a bit less
ready-to-go than I had hoped. We still have the read-hole, so the sort
of errors we can expect to detect is a bit limited.
Still, managed to come up with some schemes that I think are
interesting:
- ckprogs - Limited to catching bit-errors during progs, but these tests
work great.
- ckdata - Limited to manual bit-errors, but can detect both metdata +
data errors.
- ckmeta+ckfetches - Limited to manual bit-errors, ckmeta detects
mtree errors, while ckfetches detects btree + data errors.
- ckmeta+ckdatacksums - Limited to manual bit-errors, ckmeta detects
metadata errors, while ckdatacksums detects data errors.
To make testing manual bit-errors a bit easier, and to avoid
reimplementing the bit randomizer in emubd, I added
LFS_EMUBD_BADBLOCK_MANUAL and lfs_emubd_flip to let the tests manually
control when bits flip.
---
Unfortunately open files are proving to be an issue for these tests,
since we don't really expect corrupted metadata after lfsr_file_open (
assuming no read-hole).
For now I've limited these new ck-modes to the tests without open files,
but we should probably revisit this.
Christopher Haster
cae8b08dc9