This moves all of the shrub tracking logic from lfsr_obshrub_t into
lfsr_bshrub_t, completely drops the lfsr_obshrub_t type, and changes all
lfsr_bshrub_* functions to take lfsr_bshrub_t instead of the mdir+shrub
pair.
This makes the lfsr_bshrub_* functions <-> lfsr_bshrub_t relationship
more consistent with other APIs, such as lfsr_btree_t:
- lfsr_bshrub_lookupnext(lfs, &file->o.o.mdir, &file->o.bshrub, ...)
+ lfsr_bshrub_lookupnext(lfs, &file->b, ...)
I think the reason why this design wasn't obvious before is because, at
least conceptually, having the lfsr_mdir_t live inside the lfsr_bshrub_t
is a bit weird. It's only thanks to lfsr_file_t invasively using the
internal lfsr_mdir_t that we can avoid duplicate lfsr_mdir_t objects.
This also reorganizes the structs in lfs.h a bit, and renames the
related file.o -> file.b fields (much needed because lfs->gc.t.o.o.mdir.
rbyd.blocks was starting to get _real_ confusing).
---
Unfortunately, reducing the number of arguments to lfsr_bshrub_*
functions did not save nearly as much code as I thought it would. It
even ended up with a net _increase_ of code, apparently due to needing
to recalculate the bshrub->shrub offset more often:
code stack ctx
before: 36476 2608 640
after: 36484 (+0.0%) 2608 (+0.0%) 640 (+0.0%)
Strange, but this rework is still worthwhile if only for the code
readability.
Christopher Haster
bc639b03f2