The motivation for this comes from the observation that many users call
sync on every file write. Much more than I expected. I think one reason
is in embedded systems it's common to just write structs to disk, either
the whole file or to a log.
O_SYNC exists in POSIX/Lunix/etc, so it makes sense to provide in
littlefs. In theory it's just one extra function call, and may even save
in total application cost (though we don't measure this) by reducing the
number of function calls at the application-level.
---
Unfortunately in-practice turned out to be quite a bit different than
in-theory... The main culprit being the improved guarantees around error
atomicity...
The ideal guarantee is that if there is an error during a write, the
entire write operation is reverted. Combining this with O_SYNC means we
need to hold a copy of the origin file state all thwe way through our
sync call. This got a bit messy...
The annoying part isn't even the functionality! Our system of tracking
btree/bshrub snapshots is quite robust! The problems were entirely with:
1. Figuring out how the heck to avoid clobbering the old file buffer
state.
2. Figuring out how the internal APIs should work while passing around a
bunch of staging state.
For 1., fortunately, thanks to bypassing writes, and some careful
pointer manipulation, we can void buffer clobbing. And for 2. just some
internal API work was needed. Internally all syncs end up in
lfsr_ftree_sync, though this feels a bit clumsy since the functionality
is not really ftree related...
Unfortunately, all of this added up to quite a bit more code cost than
I had hoped. In theory, adding some sort of LFS_CERAMIC/LFS_GLASS modes
that relax error atomicity for code size could help with most of this?
But it needs some thought:
code stack
before: 33324 3072
after: 33544 (+0.7%) 3072 (+0.0%)
Christopher Haster
ae2644eb88