Files
littlefs/tests
Christopher Haster b0bd026b87 Reworked ftree/bshrub/shrub relationship, staging in ftree now
This is an attempt to simplify things a bit by moving more logic into
the ftree layer, instead of spreading things around between the
bshrub/bsprout functions.

Now, functionality is organized into high-level ftree operations and
low-level shrub/sprout operations, which only care about the inlined
portion of the shrub/sprout. No more lfsr_bshrub_commit/
lfsr_bshrub_commit__ which were mostly unrelated.

This also adds a lfsr_shrub_t type, which, by taking advantage of the
unused write-related rbyd fields to store the shrub estimate, has the
same size as lfsr_rbyd_t, but can still be casted to an rbyd/btree for
use in readonly rbyd/btree functions.

I considered merging shrub/sprout esimate and shrub/sprout compact into
some sort of ftree_estimate/compact, but it's not obvious what the
benefit would be, so leaving that on the table for now.

---

One nice change is our staging copies are now at the ftree level
(ftree.u and ftree.u_, maybe not the best names, but this is what I've
been using for unions where the name doesn't really matter, god I want
unnamed unions). This simplifies staging, and avoids staging issues
where the underlying type changes.

---

A bit unrelated, but necessary to integrate lfsr_ftree_traverse, a
generalized lfsr_tinfo_t type for all traversal functions was added
(adopted from lfsr_traversal_t really). This is a straightforward tagged
union with relevant traversal types.

The benefit of a generalized tinfo type is better chance we can just
pass the tinfo pointer through multiple layers.

Code changes:

            code          stack
  before:  33368           2984
  after:   33260 (-0.3%)   3024 (+1.3%)
2024-02-03 18:15:07 -06:00
..
2023-12-12 12:07:55 -06:00
2023-12-06 22:23:45 -06:00