Files
littlefs/tests
Christopher Haster 5b0ec8090a Adopted rattr.from for simpler appendrattr_ lazy encoding
This breaks down the previously 16-bit rattr.count field into two 8-bit
rattr.from and rattr.count fields. Now, instead of using a mixture of
rattr.tag and sign(rattr.count) to determine rattr encoding, we just
jump based on rattr.from:

  lfs3_rattr_t:
  .---+---+---+---.
  |  tag  |frm|cnt| -+-> 16-bit tag   - on-disk encoding + rbyd flags
  +---+---+---+---+  +->  8-bit from  - in-RAM encoding
  |     weight    |  '->  8-bit count - from-specific count
  +---+---+---+---+
  |      ptr      |
  '---+---+---+---'

The internal appendrattr_ ctx also saw a bit of rework, and now uses a
big union with multiple buffers instead of stacking a ridiculous number
of LFS_MAX calls. Expanding the LFS_MAX stack grows O(n^2), so this is
probably good for compile times.

And all rattr.from branches now generate an lfs3_data_t*. This was
already a side-effect of all the internal lfs3_data_from* functions, and
it simplifies the tail end of appendrattr_. No more relying on
data_count's sign bit.

Also rearranged rattr.from encoders to match source code order.

---

Unfortunately, while this did simplify the source code, it didn't really
lead to much improvement in code size:

           code          stack          ctx
  before: 37024           2416          652
  after:  37016 (-0.0%)   2416 (+0.0%)  652 (+0.0%)

I guess jump tables are more a performance optimization than a code size
one. That and the benefit of cheaper appendrattr_ logic is likely
overshadowed by the extra constants needed to populate rattr.from in
every LFS3_RATTR_* macro.

Also test_attrs_fattr_resync_receive is now failing, but I think that's
just because of an unrelated bug exposed by the shrinking count field.
In theory rattr.count should be limited to internal fixed-size buffers.
2025-07-15 16:50:11 -05:00
..