And tweaked a few related comments.
I'm still on the fence with this name, I don't think it's great, but it
at least betters describes the "repopulation" operation than
"rebuilding". The important distinction is that we don't throw away
information. Bad/erased block info (future) is still carried over into
the new gbmap snapshot, and persists unless you explicitly call
rmgbmap + mkgbmap.
So, adopting gbmap_repop_thresh for now to see if it's just a habit
thing, but may adopt a different name in the future.
As a plus, gbmap_repop_thresh is two characters shorter.
Christopher Haster
3b4e1e9e0b