It's probably a bad reason, but this avoids wasting too much time
figuring out how to name things.
Now most traversal functions return an lfsr_tag_t + lfsr_bptr_t pair,
which is enough to describe the current relevant traversal objects:
tag=LFSR_TAG_MDIR => (lfsr_mdir_t*)bptr.data.u.buffer
tag=LFSR_TAG_BRANCH => (lfsr_rbyd_t*)bptr.data.u.buffer
tag=LFSR_TAG_DATA => bptr.data
tag=LFSR_TAG_BPTR => bptr
This would be a bit better if lfsr_data_t's buffer field was a void*,
but that would mess with byte-level arithmetic, which is more common
with lfsr_data_ts.
This also adopts the fragmented/optional out-params used elsewhere in
the codebase. I thought this would add quite a bit more stack cost,
since we need redundant tags/bptrs to make lfsr_mtree_traverse/
lfsr_mtree_gc work, but surprisingly not:
code stack
before: 35256 2680
after: 35228 (-0.1%) 2680 (+0.0%)
It seems we make up the extra stack cost of redundant tags/bptrs by
giving the compiler more stack-alloc flexibility, tighter per-function
return types, and opting-out of tags/bptrs in most low-level traversals:
lfs_alloc mainly.
But if the fragmented/optional out-params is net harmful for code/stack
size, we should reconsider the pattern system-wide. This does probably
deserve a second look in the future...
Christopher Haster
2e6a5be4e3