We had to be a bit clever with our lfsr_mtree_t representation to
support msprouts. Now that we don't support msprouts, we can simplify
this and drop the lfsr_mtree_t type completely! which is nice for both
code cost and readability.
Saves a bit more code:
code stack ctx
before: 38344 2624 640
after: 38284 (-0.2%) 2624 (+0.0%) 640 (+0.0%)
Which increases the total savings of dropping msprouts:
code stack ctx
yes msprouts: 38508 2624 640
no msprouts: 38284 (-0.6%) 2624 (+0.0%) 640 (+0.0%)
Christopher Haster
01f2d613bd