18 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Christopher Haster 1f82c0f27f Added some metadata_max testing
- Added METADATA_MAX to test_runner.
- Added METADATA_MAX to bench_runner.
- Added a simple metadata_max test to test_superblocks, for lack of
  better location.

There have been several issues floating around related to metadata_max
and LFS_ERR_NOSPC which makes me think there's a bug in our metadata_max
logic.

metadata_max was a quick patch and is relatively untested, so an
undetected bug isn't too surprising. This commit adds at least some
testing over metadata_max.

Sure enough, the new test_superblocks_metadata_max test reveals a
curious LFS_ERR_NAMETOOLONG error that shouldn't be there.

More investigation needed.
2024-10-04 13:06:23 -05:00
Christopher Haster a60a986c9c Duplicate the superblock entry during superblock expansion
The documentation does not match the implementation here. The intended
behavior of superblock expansion was to duplicate the current superblock
entry into the new superblock:

   .--------.  .--------.
  .|littlefs|->|littlefs|
  ||bs=4096 | ||bs=4096 |
  ||bc=256  | ||bc=256  |
  ||crc32   | ||root dir|
  ||        | ||crc32   |
  |'--------' |'--------'
  '--------'  '--------'

The main benefit is that we can rely on the magic string "littlefs"
always residing in blocks 0x{0,1}, even if the superblock chain has
multiple superblocks.

The downside is that earlier superblocks in the superblock chain may
contain out-of-date configuration. This is a bit annoying, and risks
hard-to-reach bugs, but in theory shouldn't break anything as long as
the filesystem is aware of this.

Unfortunately this was lost at some point during refactoring in the
early v2-alpha work. A lot of code was moving around in this stage, so
it's a bit hard to track down the change and if it was intentional. The
result is superblock expansion creates a valid linked-list of
superblocks, but only the last superblock contains a valid superblock
entry:

   .--------.  .--------.
  .|crc32   |->|littlefs|
  ||        | ||bs=4096 |
  ||        | ||bc=256  |
  ||        | ||root dir|
  ||        | ||crc32   |
  |'--------' |'--------'
  '--------'  '--------'

What's interesting is this isn't invalid as far as lfs_mount is
concerned. lfs_mount is happy as long as a superblock entry exists
anywhere in the superblock chain. This is good for compat flexibility,
but is the main reason this has gone unnoticed for so long.

---

With the benefit of more time to think about the problem, it may have
been more preferable to copy only the "littlefs" magic string and NOT
the superblock entry:

   .--------.  .--------.
  .|littlefs|->|littlefs|
  ||crc32c  | ||bs=4096 |
  ||        | ||bc=256  |
  ||        | ||root dir|
  ||        | ||crc32   |
  |'--------' |'--------'
  '--------'  '--------'

This would allow for simple "littlefs" magic string checks without the
risks associated with out-of-date superblock entries.

Unfortunately the current implementation errors if it finds a "littlefs"
magic string without an associated superblock entry, so such a change
would not be compatible with old drivers.

---

This commit tweaks superblock expansion to duplicate the superblock
entry instead of simply moving it to the new superblock. And adds tests
over the magic string "littlefs" both before and after superblock
expansion.

Found by rojer and Nikola Kosturski
2024-03-19 00:48:56 -05:00
Christopher Haster f2a6f45eef Added out-of-order write testing to emubd
Some forms of storage, mainly anything with an FTL, eMMC, SD, etc, do
not guarantee a strict write order for writes to different blocks. It
would be good to test that this doesn't break littlefs.

This adds LFS_EMUBD_POWERLOSS_OOO to lfs_emubd, which tells lfs_emubd to
try to break any order-dependent code on powerloss.

The behavior right now is a bit simple, but does result in test
breakage:

1. Save the state of the block on first write (erase really) after
   sync/init.

2. On powerloss, revert the first write to its original state.

This might be a bit confusing when debugging, since the block will
appear to time-travel, but doing anything fancier would make emubd quite
a bit more complicated.

You could also get a bit fancier with which/how many blocks to revert,
but this should at least be sufficient to make sure bd sync calls are in
the right place.
2024-02-27 13:59:37 -06:00
Christopher Haster 23505fa9fa Added lfs_fs_grow for growing the filesystem to a different block_count
The initial implementation for this was provided by kaetemi, originally
as a mount flag. However, it has been modified here to be self-contained
in an explicit runtime function that can be called after mount.

The reasons for an explicit function:

1. lfs_mount stays a strictly readonly operation, and avoids pulling in
   all of the write machinery.

2. filesystem-wide operations such as lfs_fs_grow can be a bit risky,
   and irreversable. The action of growing the filesystem should be very
   intentional.

---

One concern with this change is that this will be the first function
that changes metadata in the superblock. This might break tools that
expect the first valid superblock entry to contain the most recent
metadata, since only the last superblock in the superblock chain will
contain the updated metadata.
2023-09-12 01:32:09 -05:00
Christopher Haster 127d84b681 Added a couple mixed/unknown block_count tests
These were cherry-picked from some previous work on a related feature.
2023-09-12 01:14:39 -05:00
Brian Pugh 23089d5758 remove previous block_count detection from lfs_format 2023-08-20 14:10:12 -07:00
Brian Pugh 5caa83fb77 forgot to unmount lfs in test; leaking memory 2023-08-17 22:10:53 -07:00
Brian Pugh 2ebfec78c3 test for failure when interpretting block count when formatting without superblock 2023-08-17 15:20:46 -07:00
Brian Pugh 3d0bcf4066 Add test_superblocks_mount_unknown_block_count 2023-08-17 15:13:16 -07:00
Brian Pugh df238ebac6 Add a unit test; currently hanging on final permutation.
Some block-device bound-checks are disabled during superblock search.
2023-08-16 23:07:55 -07:00
Christopher Haster b72c96d440 Added support for writing on-disk version lfs2.0
The intention is to help interop with older minor versions of littlefs.

Unfortunately, since lfs2.0 drivers cannot mount lfs2.1 images, there are
situations where it would be useful to write to write strictly lfs2.0
compatible images. The solution here adds a "disk_version" configuration
option which determines the behavior of lfs2.1 dependent features.

Normally you would expect this to only change write behavior. But since the
main change in lfs2.1 increased validation of erased data, we also need to
skip this extra validation (fcrc) or see terrible slowdowns when writing.
2023-06-29 12:31:22 -05:00
Christopher Haster 265692e709 Removed fsinfo.block_usage for now
In terms of ease-of-use, a user familiar with other filesystems expects
block_usage in fsinfo. But in terms of practicality, block_usage can be
expensive to find in littlefs, so if it's not needed in the resulting
fsinfo, that operation is wasteful.

It's not clear to me what the best course of action is, but since
block_usage can always be added to fsinfo later, but not removed without
breaking backwards compatibility, I'm leaving this out for now.

Block usage can still be found by explicitly calling lfs_fs_size.
2023-06-29 12:23:33 -05:00
Christopher Haster c5fb3f181b Changed fsinfo.minor_version -> fsinfo.disk_version
Version are now returned with major/minor packed into 32-bits,
so 0x00020001 is the current disk version, for example.

1. This needed to change to use a disk_* prefix for consistency with the
   defines that already exist for LFS_VERSION/LFS_DISK_VERSION.

2. Encoding the version this way has the nice side effect of making 0 an
   invalid value. This is useful for adding a similar config option
   that needs to have reasonable default behavior for backwards
   compatibility.

In theory this uses more space, but in practice most other config/status
is 32-bits in littlefs. We would be wasting this space for alignment
anyways.
2023-06-06 22:03:00 -05:00
Christopher Haster 87bbf1d374 Added lfs_fs_stat for access to filesystem status/configuration
Currently this includes:

- minor_version - on-disk minor version
- block_usage - estimated number of in-use blocks
- name_max - configurable name limit
- file_max - configurable file limit
- attr_max - configurable attr limit

These are currently the only configuration operations that need to be
written to disk. Other configuration is either needed to mount, such as
block_size, or does not change the on-disk representation, such as
read/prog_size.

This also includes the current block usage, which is common in other
filesystems, though a more expensive to find in littlefs. I figure it's
not unreasonable to make lfs_fs_stat no worse than block allocation,
hopefully this isn't a mistake. It may be worth caching the current
usage after the most recent lookahead scan.

More configuration may be added to this struct in the future.
2023-06-06 13:02:16 -05:00
Christopher Haster 1a07c2ce0d A number of small script fixes/tweaks from usage
- Fixed prettyasserts.py parsing when '->' is in expr

- Made prettyasserts.py failures not crash (yay dynamic typing)

- Fixed the initial state of the emubd disk file to match the internal
  state in RAM

- Fixed true/false getting changed to True/False in test.py/bench.py
  defines

- Fixed accidental substring matching in plot.py's --by comparison

- Fixed a missed LFS_BLOCk_CYCLES in test_superblocks.toml that was
  missed

- Changed test.py/bench.py -v to only show commands being run

  Including the test output is still possible with test.py -v -O-, making
  the implicit inclusion redundant and noisy.

- Added license comments to bench_runner/test_runner
2022-11-15 13:42:07 -06:00
Christopher Haster 11d6d1251e Dropped namespacing of test cases
The main benefit is small test ids everywhere, though this is with the
downside of needing longer names to properly prefix and avoid
collisions. But this fits into the rest of the scripts with globally
unique names a bit better. This is a C project after all.

The other small benefit is test generators may have an easier time since
per-case symbols can expect to be unique.
2022-09-17 03:03:39 -05:00
Christopher Haster 0781f50edb Ported tests to new framework
This mostly required names for each test case, declarations of
previously-implicit variables since the new test framework is more
conservative with what it declares (the small extra effort to add
declarations is well worth the simplicity and improved readability),
and tweaks to work with not-really-constant defines.

Also renamed test_ -> test, replacing the old ./scripts/test.py,
unfortunately git seems to have had a hard time with this.
2022-06-06 01:35:03 -05:00
Christopher Haster 50fe8ae258 Renamed test_format -> test_superblocks, tweaked superblock tests
With the superblock expansion stuff, the test_format tests have grown
to test more advanced superblock-related features. This is fine but
deserves a rename so it's more clear.

Also fixed a typo that meant tests never ran with block cycles.
2020-02-22 23:35:28 -06:00