Note this includes both the lfs3_config -> lfs3_cfg structs as well as
the LFS3_CONFIG -> LFS3_CFG include define:
- LFS3_CONFIG -> LFS3_CFG
- struct lfs3_config -> struct lfs3_cfg
- struct lfs3_file_config -> struct lfs3_file_cfg
- struct lfs3_*bd_config -> struct lfs3_*bd_cfg
- cfg -> cfg
We were already using cfg as the variable name everywhere. The fact that
these names were different was an inconsistency that should be fixed
since we're committing to an API break.
LFS3_CFG is already out-of-date from upstream, and there's plans for a
config rework, but I figured I'd go ahead and change it as well to lower
the chances it gets overlooked.
---
Note this does _not_ affect LFS3_TAG_CONFIG. Having the on-disk vs
driver-level config take slightly different names is not a bad thing.
Seems like a better name now that LFS_TYPE_STICKYNOTE is its own file
type.
Though this does contain some tests that I think don't even use
stickynotes...
This is mainly to solve the weird check-hole where passing CKPROGS/
CKREADS as mount flags has no effect on lfsr_format (I mean, it'd be a
bit silly if it did somehow):
LFS_F_RDWR 0 // Format the filesystem as read and write
LFS_F_CKPROGS 0x00000010 // Check progs by reading back progged data
LFS_F_CKREADS 0x00000020 // Check reads via parity bits/checksums
This makes lfsr_format a more cumbersome interface, but I don't know if
this is necessarily a bad thing. There's always risk of data loss when
calling lfsr_format, so maybe it should be a pain to call.
At the very least, format flags may be useful in the future for
enabling/disabling format-time things such as the planned block-map,
parity-tree, etc. Though it's unclear if such significant settings
should be format flags or somehow encoded as fields in our config
struct.
---
The LFS_F_* format flags of course ended up conflicting with our
internal LFS_F_* flags, so I renamed most of the internal flags to match
the closest flag set they participate in:
- LFS_F_TYPE -> LFS_O_TYPE
- LFS_F_UNFLUSH -> LFS_O_UNFLUSH
- LFS_F_UNSYNC -> LFS_O_UNSYNC
- LFS_F_ORPHAN -> LFS_O_ORPHAN
- LFS_F_ZOMBIE -> LFS_O_ZOMBIE
- LFS_F_ORPHANS -> LFS_I_ORPHANS
- LFS_F_UNCOMPACTED -> LFS_I_UNCOMPACTED
- LFS_F_TSTATE -> LFS_T_TSTATE
- LFS_F_BTYPE -> LFS_T_BTYPE
- LFS_F_DIRTY -> LFS_T_DIRTY
- LFS_F_MUTATED -> LFS_T_MUTATED
This may make it a bit less clear which flags are a part of the public
API, vs intended only for internal use, but at the very least our asserts
in format/mount/open/etc should catch most of these mistakes.
---
Code cost ended up being pretty minimal. Actually negative. This is the
second time we're _adding_ a feature that somehow saves code, though the
reality for this one is we're really just pushing constants up into the
user's stack frame. Still, it's a good indication the cost of format
flags is small:
code stack
before: 36452 2680
after: 36448 (-0.0%) 2680 (+0.0%)
This has been a long-time coming, mount flags are just too useful for
configuring a filesystem at runtime.
Currently this is limited to LFS_M_RDONLY and LFS_M_CKPROGS, but there
are a few more planned in the future:
LFS_M_RDWR = 0x0000, // Mount the filesystem as read and write
LFS_M_RDONLY = 0x0001, // Mount the filesystem as readonly
LFS_M_STRICT* = 0x0002, // Error if on-disk config does not match
LFS_M_FORCE* = 0x0004, // Ignore compat flags, mount readonly
LFS_M_FORCEWITHRECKLESSABANDON*
= 0x0008, // Ignore compat flags, mount read write
LFS_M_CKPROGS = 0x0010, // Check progs by reading back progged data
LFS_M_CKREADS* = 0x0020, // Check reads via checksums
* Hypothetical
As a convenience, we also return mount flags in the struct lfs_fsinfo's
flags field as their relevant LFS_I_* variants. Though only to match
statvfs, and only because it's cheap, littlefs's API is low-level and we
should expect users to know what flags they passed to lfsr_mount.
As for the new mount flags:
- LFS_M_RDONLY - For consistency with existing APIs, this just asserts
on write operations, which makes it a bit useless... But the info flag
LFS_I_RDONLY may be useful for falling back to a readonly mode if
we encounter on-disk compat issues.
At least if implement the theoretical LFS_UNTRUSTED_USER mode
LFS_M_RDONLY could become a runtime error.
- LFS_M_RDWR - This really just exists to compliment LFS_M_RDONLY and to
match LFS_O_RDONLY/LFS_O_RDWR. It's just an alias for 0, and I don't
think there will ever be a reason to make it non-0 (but I can always
be wrong!).
- LFS_M_CKPROGS - This replaces the check_progs config option and avoids
using a full byte to store a bool.
We should probably also have a compile-time option to compile this out
(LFS_NO_CKPROGS?), but that's a future thing to do.
This ended up adding a surprising bit of code, considering we're just
moving flags around, and noise in lfs_alloc added a bit of stack again:
code stack
before: 35880 2672
after: 35932 (+0.1%) 2680 (+0.3%)
With rcompat/wcompat flags, on-disk minor version bumps will hopefully
not be needed for a long time (ever?). And if the on-disk version never
changes, why was a word to report it every lfsr_fs_stat call?
But this may be something to listen to user feedback on. Worst case we
can always readd fsinfo.disk_version if users find it useful.
Code changes:
code stack
before: 33922 2592
after: 33918 (-0.0%) 2592 (+0.0%)
Unlike the other test_compat tests, the test_incompat tests cover
specific corner cases and don't require any special linking. We probably
always want to run these, and keeping them merged with test_compat risks
the entire suite being omitted at some point.
The test_compat tests are a bit special and probably deserves a
dedicated test suite.
test_compat has been very useful for testing compatibility on patch and
minor releases.
Though, in porting the tests, I've realized these are actually really
flimsy w.r.t. API changes... lfsp_config notably relies on compatible
struct layouts, which is _not_ guaranteed by littlefs's compatibility
rules.
For this reason I've restricted these tests to only run if LFS_VERSION
doesn't change, though this may be worth reinvestigating in the future.
test_compat on minor API releases would be quite valuable...
lfsr_fs_stat is also not quite up to date with upstream yet. It's really
just a small shim copying over static configs at the moment (except for
name_limit/file_limit). This is because we're still missing most of what
would actually be interesting here: variable block counts, minor
versions, etc.
And of course a minimal lfsr_fs_stat means minimal code changes:
code stack
before: 33642 2592
after: 33670 (+0.1%) 2592 (+0.0%)
Christopher Haster