Instead of iterating over a number of seeds in the test itself, the
seeds are now permuted as a part of normal test defines.
This lets each seed take advantage of other test features, mainly the
ability to test powerlosses heuristically.
This is probably how it should have been done in the first place, but
the permutation tests can't do this since the number of permutations
changes as the size of the test input changes. The test define system
can't handle that very well.
The tradeoffs here are:
- We can't do cross-fuzz checks, such as the balance checks in the rbyd
tests, though those really should be moved to benchmarks anyways.
- The large number of cheap fuzz permutations skews the total
permutation count, though I'm not sure this matters.
before: 3083 permutations (-Gnor)
after: 409893 permutations (-Gnor)
It doesn't make sense to test more complex logic, such as t2_btree.toml,
when the logic it is built on, t1_rbyd.toml, does not past testing. The
test runner already guarantees a consistent lexicographic order, so all
we need to do is renamed these from test_* -> tn_*.
Note, if we every have more than 10 tests, we will need to bump up the
number of digits for all tests, so t1_rbyd.toml -> t01_rbyd.toml. This
is the main downside of lexicographic ordering. But we'll cross that
bridge when we get to it.
Christopher Haster