This gives us much more room for activities.
It makes sense to keep the test disk small: easier parallelization,
heavier emubd with more test features, and if you're running into space
issues in a test, that usually just means you need to be more creative
with how the test is setup.
But for benches, we're interested what happens when we throw a ton of
data at the system.
Also defaulted to noop erases. 0xff erases behave more predictably,
which is useful for testing. But for benching, less work is faster.
These were copied from external benchmarks, and tweaked/simplified a
bit based on gained experience.
I mostly just wanted something to test the bench runner/scripts, with
bench_rbyd showcasing a low-level litmus benchmark, and bench_wt
showcasing a high-level throughput benchmark.
Though bench_wt has proven to be a _very_ versatile benchmark, and will
likely be the first stop for getting an understanding of high-level
performance implications.
---
Also added bench_helpers.h/c, which includes a couple helper functions:
- bench_helpers_warmup - Warm up the filesystem by writing a 1 block
file 2*block_count times. This is meant to exhaust any preerased
state, post-format lookahead buffers, etc.
- bench_helpers_usage - Find a tight bound on disk usage. This allocates
a bitmap to find the tight bound, unlike lfs3_fs_usage, which is
best-effort. However the bitmap is hidden behind BENCH_HEAP_PAUSE to
prevent messing with parallel heap measurements.
Christopher Haster