With rcompat/wcompat flags, on-disk minor version bumps will hopefully
not be needed for a long time (ever?). And if the on-disk version never
changes, why was a word to report it every lfsr_fs_stat call?
But this may be something to listen to user feedback on. Worst case we
can always readd fsinfo.disk_version if users find it useful.
Code changes:
code stack
before: 33922 2592
after: 33918 (-0.0%) 2592 (+0.0%)
Unlike the other test_compat tests, the test_incompat tests cover
specific corner cases and don't require any special linking. We probably
always want to run these, and keeping them merged with test_compat risks
the entire suite being omitted at some point.
The test_compat tests are a bit special and probably deserves a
dedicated test suite.
test_compat has been very useful for testing compatibility on patch and
minor releases.
Though, in porting the tests, I've realized these are actually really
flimsy w.r.t. API changes... lfsp_config notably relies on compatible
struct layouts, which is _not_ guaranteed by littlefs's compatibility
rules.
For this reason I've restricted these tests to only run if LFS_VERSION
doesn't change, though this may be worth reinvestigating in the future.
test_compat on minor API releases would be quite valuable...
lfsr_fs_stat is also not quite up to date with upstream yet. It's really
just a small shim copying over static configs at the moment (except for
name_limit/file_limit). This is because we're still missing most of what
would actually be interesting here: variable block counts, minor
versions, etc.
And of course a minimal lfsr_fs_stat means minimal code changes:
code stack
before: 33642 2592
after: 33670 (+0.1%) 2592 (+0.0%)
Christopher Haster