LFS3_CKDATACKSUMREADS is just too much.
The downside is it may not be clear how LFS3_CKDATACKSUMREADS interacts
with the future planned LFS3_CKREADS (LFS3_CKREADS implies
LFS3_CKDATACKSUMS + LFS3_CKMETAREDUND), but on the flip side you may
actually be able to type LFS3_CKDATACKSUMS on the first try.
Like LFS3_RDONLY and LFS3_KVONLY, LFS3_2BONLY opts-out of all of the
logic necessary for filesystems larger than 2-blocks (the mimimum size
of a mutable littlefs image).
This has potential for some pretty big savings:
- No block allocation
- No lookahead buffer
- No btrees (but yes bshrubs)
- No bptrs
- No mtree traversal
Which is I guess ~1/4 of the codebase:
code stack ctx
default: 37836 2416 636
2bonly: 27704 (-26.8%) 1872 (-22.5%) 592 (-6.9%)
This can be combined with LFS3_KVONLY for a small key-value store
compatible with the full littlefs driver:
code stack ctx
default: 37836 2416 636
kvonly: 30792 (-18.6%) 2168 (-10.3%) 636 (+0.0%)
kvonly+2bonly: 22900 (-39.5%) 1736 (-28.1%) 592 (-6.9%)
It may be possible to optimize this further, but, as is the case with
LFS3_KVONLY, balancing config-specific optimization vs maintainability
is tricky.
---
I'm not sure why, but this also reduced the default build's size a bit.
Compiler noise?
code stack ctx
before: 37860 2416 636
after: 37836 (-0.1%) 2416 (+0.0%) 636 (+0.0%)
One of the ideas behind the key-value API is that it is potentially much
cheaper than a full file API. With the key-value API, we get the
guarantee that all data must fit in RAM, and avoid headaches like
random reads/writes and needing to broadcast file state.
For an example of just how much complexity is avoided, the see the
difference between lfs3_file_flushonce_ vs the mess that is
lfs3_file_flush_ + lfs3_file_crystallize + lfs3_file_graft.
However, littlefs is designed around files, and a couple design
decisions hold back how much code saving is possible:
1. littlefs's shrubs are designed around being enrolled in the omdir
linked-list, so internally we still have most of the file open/close
code lumbering around.
2. Directories and traversals still exist, so we'd need the omdir
linked-list anyways, and we still need to broadcast _some_ changes.
3. Despite being intended for small amounts of data, lfs3_set/get can
still be used to create arbitrarily large files. So we still need all
of the bshrub/btree logic.
Which we still need for the mtree anyways, so this isn't really that
much of a downside.
It also may be possible to save more code by aggressively rewriting the
_entire_ read/write path for lfs3_set/get, to not reuse any of the
existing file logic in LFS3_KVONLY mode. But I decided against this due
to concerns around maintainability.
The duplicate lfs3_file_read + lfs3_file_readonce and lfs3_file_flush_ +
lfs3_file_flushonce_ are already enough of a concern.
Anyways, here's LFS3_KVONLY:
code stack ctx
default: 37824 2416 636
kvonly: 30936 (-18.2%) 2168 (-10.3%) 636 (+0.0%)
LFS3_RDONLY + LFS3_KVONLY is also interesting:
code stack ctx
rdonly: 10776 856 508
rdonly+kvonly: 9904 (-8.1%) 888 (+3.7%) 508 (+0.0%)
---
This also added some noise to the default build's code, mainly due to
tweaks in lfs3_file_readnext to allow better reuse in LFS3_KVONLY:
code stack ctx
before: 37824 2416 636
after: 37860 (+0.1%) 2416 (+0.0%) 636 (+0.0%)
This is the new readonly flag, to be consistent with LFS3_M_RDONLY and
friends.
Note this overlaps with LFS3_YES_RDONLY in a weird way, where
LFS3_YES_RDONLY is basically just an alias for LFS3_RDONLY. For most
flags, LFS3_THING enables the _option_ of using LFS3_M_THING, with
LFS3_YES_THING implying LFS3_M_THING in all mount calls. But
LFS3_RDONLY _disables_ the option of using LFS3_M_RDWR, so it's a bit
different...
Do we really need two flags for the same thing? Not sure. But most users
probably expect LFS3_RDONLY coming from other filesystems.
Worst case this can be revisited in the planned config API rework.
---
As for the readonly code size, this is just the first draft and limited
to mostly ifdefing out all prog/write logic paths. There's some TODOs in
the code that may save a bit more (rbyd.eoff, file.b.shrub_ for
example). But the results are looking ok:
code stack ctx
v2.11.0 rdonly: 6270 448 580
v3-alpha rdonly: 10776 (+71.9%) 840 (+87.5%) 524 (-9.7%)
It's interesting to note most of the additional code/stack cost come
from filesystem traversal. In v2, the threaded linked-list made rdonly
traversal _incredibly_ cheap. But the extra rdwr baggage of turning
littlefs into a fully connected graph made it something to be avoided
in v3.
This hits v3 with the double whammy of:
1. Filesystem traversal is more complicated since we need to keep track
of which btree and where in the btree we are
2. Everything needs to be tracked explicitly due to the new inverted
state-machine driven API (no callbacks)
Note that even if we disabled the traversal APIs, lfs3_fs_usage, cksum
checking, etc, we'd still need to traverse to rebuild gstate. Otherwise
we risk showing grmed files after a powerloss.
---
This did affect the default build a little bit, due to moving things
around for nicer ifdef groupings:
code stack ctx
default before: 37300 2280 636
default after: 37304 (+0.0%) 2280 (+0.0%) 636 (+0.0%)
Christopher Haster