Well this turned into a never-ending can of worms...
I guess the good news is our newly added lfsr_grow_incr_* tests are
_very_ good at finding post-error-resume bugs.
Implementation-wise, this was fairly straightforward thanks to prior
work by BrianPugh, kaetemi, and myself:
1. Made block_count pseudo-optional by adding lfs.block_count so we can
mutate it based on what we find on-disk.
This was done a bit different from the previous implementation,
instead of setting block_count=0 to read the block_count from disk,
we allow any block_count <= the configured block_count.
This matches how we handle name_limit/file_limit/etc, and allows
users to mount a filesystem with unknown block_count while asserting
an upper bound.
2. Added lfsr_fs_grow, which can grow the filesystem.
The is basically the same as the previous implementation except we're
a bit more careful with the lookahead buffer.
I thought the previous impl might have been broken w.r.t. lookahead
buffer, but fortunately it's only broken in a way that makes us think
newly available blocks are temporarily in-use. Which is a bit funny.
One interesting thing that came out with more aggressive tests is
that it's possible to get locked-up in lfsr_fs_preparemutation trying
to clean up grms/orphans before we change the filesystem size.
Fortunately it turns out we don't _really_ need to call
lfsr_fs_preparemutation here. This gets a bit delicate, but means we
should always be able to grow a full filesystem.
To test this I've added both the simple grow/error tests from the
previous version, as well as a set of fuzz tests (a la test_relocations
and friends) that incrementally grow the filesystem when encountering
LFS_ERR_NOSPC. These have a surprising amount coverage, testing
lfsr_fs_grow, lfsr_fs_stat, lfsr_fs_size, and resuming operations after
encountering an error.
Which also means they found bugs:
- lfs_alloc_setinuse was not broken before, because lookahead.start was
always a multiple of lookahead_size. But now with lfs_alloc_discard,
this invariant may not be true.
I've just changed all lookahead.start updates to mod block_count. This
adds a bit of code, but is much easier to reason about.
While fixing this, I also added an assert to never allocate blocks
{0,1} in lfs_alloc. This is a good assert to have, but did require
some tweaks to test_btree to avoid these blocks.
- We were incorrectly patching grms in lfsr_mdir_commit when mdelta=0.
Funnily enough we also proceed to ignore the patched grm most of the
time when mdelta=0, so this went unnoticed.
- It turns out we're completely ignoring rid=-1 attrs if we split the
mroot. Not sure how this was missed. It's a bit important.
Note this is still broken. Fixing this requires some rather invasive
changes to lfsr_mdir_commit's internal logic that should probably be
in another commit...
Note again fwrite_fuzz is omitted. Currently the state of data in opened
files is undefined after a failed write, so this wouldn't really be
testing anything interesting...
More features = more code, and all of this bug fixing meant several
things contributed to code/stack changes in this commit:
code stack
before: 33654 2592
+variable block_count: 33646 (-0.0%) 2584 (+0.0%)
+lfsr_fs_grow: 33818 (+0.5%) 2584 (-0.3%)
+lookahead-start-fix: 33842 (+0.6%) 2584 (-0.3%)
+grm-patch-fix (after): 33850 (+0.6%) 2584 (-0.3%)
Wild that variable block_count actually saves code/stack. I guess the
indirect lfs->cfg->block_count load can get costly...
Christopher Haster