This adds LFS3_o_WRSET as an internal-only 3rd file open mode (I knew
that missing open mode would come in handy) that has some _very_
interesting behavior:
- Do _not_ clear the configured file cache. The file cache is prefilled
with the file's data.
- If the file does _not_ exist and is small, create it immediately in
lfs3_file_open using the provided file cache.
- If the file _does_ exist or is not small, do nothing and open the file
normally. lfs3_file_close/sync can do the rest of the work in one
commit.
This makes it possible to implement one-commit lfs3_set on top of the
file APIs with minimal code impact:
- All of the metadata commit logic can be handled by lfs3_file_sync_, we
just call lfs3_file_sync_ with the found did+name in lfs3_file_opencfg
when WRSET.
- The invariant that lfs3_file_opencfg always reserves an mid remains
intact, since we go ahead and write the full file if necessary,
minimizing the impact on lfs3_file_opencfg's internals.
This claws back most of the code cost of the one-commit key-value API:
code stack ctx
before: 38232 2400 636
after: 37856 (-1.0%) 2416 (+0.7%) 636 (+0.0%)
before kv: 37352 2280 636
after kv: 37856 (+1.3%) 2416 (+6.0%) 636 (+0.0%)
---
I'm quite happy how this turned out. I was worried there for a bit the
key-value API was going to end up an ugly wart for the internals, but
with LFS3_o_WRSET this integrates quite nicely.
It also raises a really interesting question, should LFS3_o_WRSET be
exposed to users?
For now I'm going to play it safe and say no. While potentially useful,
it's still a pretty unintuitive API.
Another thing worth mentioning is that this does have a negative impact
on compile-time gc. Duplication adds code cost when viewing the system
as a whole, but tighter integration can backfire if the user never calls
half the APIs.
Oh well, compile-time opt-out is always an option in the future, and
users seem to care more about pre-linked measurements, probably because
it's an easier thing to find. Still, it's funny how measuring code can
have a negative impact on code. Something something Goodhart's law.
Christopher Haster