Renamed SUB/SUPWIDE -> SUB/SUPMASK

This name makes more sense to me given what these bits are doing. Though
that may just be from the embedded engineer side.
This commit is contained in:
Christopher Haster
2024-01-22 08:03:20 -06:00
parent 3c13afd5c2
commit e04748dadd
3 changed files with 32 additions and 32 deletions
+1 -1
View File
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ code = '''
// name attributes, the name attribute holds the weight not
// the struct tag
return lfsr_btree_commit(lfs, btree, LFSR_ATTRS(
LFSR_ATTR(bid, SUBWIDE(TAG(tag)), 0, DATA(data)),
LFSR_ATTR(bid, SUBMASK(TAG(tag)), 0, DATA(data)),
LFSR_ATTR(bid, GROW, weight - weight_, NULL())));
}
+10 -10
View File
@@ -11762,7 +11762,7 @@ code = '''
// remove with a wide tag
lfsr_rbyd_commit(&lfs, &rbyd, LFSR_ATTRS(
LFSR_ATTR(j, RM(SUBWIDE(UATTR)), 0, NULL()))) => 0;
LFSR_ATTR(j, RM(SUBMASK(UATTR)), 0, NULL()))) => 0;
// try traversing over the tags
lfsr_rbyd_fetch(&lfs, &rbyd, rbyd.blocks[0], CFG->block_size) => 0;
@@ -11901,7 +11901,7 @@ code = '''
// replace with bitwise inverse
lfsr_rbyd_commit(&lfs, &rbyd, LFSR_ATTRS(
LFSR_ATTR(j, SUBWIDE(UATTR(~(j + SHIFT) & 0x7f)), 0,
LFSR_ATTR(j, SUBMASK(UATTR(~(j + SHIFT) & 0x7f)), 0,
BUF(names[j % 6], 3)))) => 0;
// try traversing over the tags
@@ -12133,7 +12133,7 @@ code = '''
// remove with a wide tag
lfsr_rbyd_commit(&lfs, &rbyd, LFSR_ATTRS(
LFSR_ATTR(j, RM(SUBWIDE(UATTR)), 0, NULL()))) => 0;
LFSR_ATTR(j, RM(SUBMASK(UATTR)), 0, NULL()))) => 0;
// try traversing over the tags
lfsr_rbyd_fetch(&lfs, &rbyd, rbyd.blocks[0], CFG->block_size) => 0;
@@ -12281,7 +12281,7 @@ code = '''
// replace with bitwise inverse
lfsr_rbyd_commit(&lfs, &rbyd, LFSR_ATTRS(
LFSR_ATTR(j, SUBWIDE(UATTR(~(j + SHIFT) & 0x7f)), 0,
LFSR_ATTR(j, SUBMASK(UATTR(~(j + SHIFT) & 0x7f)), 0,
BUF(names[j % 6], 3)))) => 0;
// try traversing over the tags
@@ -12514,7 +12514,7 @@ code = '''
// remove with a wide tag
lfsr_rbyd_commit(&lfs, &rbyd, LFSR_ATTRS(
LFSR_ATTR(j, RM(SUBWIDE(UATTR)), 0, NULL()))) => 0;
LFSR_ATTR(j, RM(SUBMASK(UATTR)), 0, NULL()))) => 0;
// try traversing over the tags
lfsr_rbyd_fetch(&lfs, &rbyd, rbyd.blocks[0], CFG->block_size) => 0;
@@ -12655,7 +12655,7 @@ code = '''
// replace with bitwise inverse
lfsr_rbyd_commit(&lfs, &rbyd, LFSR_ATTRS(
LFSR_ATTR(j, SUBWIDE(UATTR(~(j + SHIFT) & 0x7f)), 0,
LFSR_ATTR(j, SUBMASK(UATTR(~(j + SHIFT) & 0x7f)), 0,
BUF(names[j % 6], 6)))) => 0;
// try traversing over the tags
@@ -12877,7 +12877,7 @@ code = '''
// remove with a wide tag
lfsr_rbyd_commit(&lfs, &rbyd, LFSR_ATTRS(
LFSR_ATTR(j, RM(SUPWIDE(UATTR)), 0, NULL()))) => 0;
LFSR_ATTR(j, RM(SUPMASK(UATTR)), 0, NULL()))) => 0;
// try traversing over the tags
lfsr_rbyd_fetch(&lfs, &rbyd, rbyd.blocks[0], CFG->block_size) => 0;
@@ -13016,7 +13016,7 @@ code = '''
// replace with bitwise inverse
lfsr_rbyd_commit(&lfs, &rbyd, LFSR_ATTRS(
LFSR_ATTR(j, SUPWIDE(UATTR(~(j + SHIFT) & 0x7f)), 0,
LFSR_ATTR(j, SUPMASK(UATTR(~(j + SHIFT) & 0x7f)), 0,
BUF(names[j % 6], 3)))) => 0;
// try traversing over the tags
@@ -13243,7 +13243,7 @@ code = '''
// subwide replace a neighbor to the hole
lfsr_rbyd_commit(&lfs, &rbyd, LFSR_ATTRS(
LFSR_ATTR(-1,
SUBWIDE(UATTR(2)), 0,
SUBMASK(UATTR(2)), 0,
BUF("\xcc\xcc\xcc\xcc", 4)))) => 0;
assert(rbyd.weight == 0);
@@ -13302,7 +13302,7 @@ code = '''
// supwide replace a neighbor to the hole
lfsr_rbyd_commit(&lfs, &rbyd, LFSR_ATTRS(
LFSR_ATTR(-1,
SUPWIDE(UATTR(2)), 0,
SUPMASK(UATTR(2)), 0,
BUF("\xcc\xcc\xcc\xcc", 4)))) => 0;
assert(rbyd.weight == 1);