Renamed lfs->cfg->shrub_size -> lfs->cfg->inline_size
While I think shrub_size is probably the more correct name at a technical level, inline_size is probably more what users expect and doesn't require a deeper understanding of filesystem details. The only risk is that users may think inline_size has no effect on large files, when in fact it still controls how much of the btree root can be inlined. There's also the point that sticking with inline_size maintains compatibility with both the upstream version and any future version that has other file representations. May revisit this, but renaming to lfs->cfg->inline_size for now.
This commit is contained in:
+3
-3
@@ -1657,7 +1657,7 @@ code = '''
|
||||
defines.BADBIT = -1
|
||||
defines.BADBLOCK_BEHAVIOR = 'LFS_EMUBD_BADBLOCK_PROGFLIP'
|
||||
# force the file to create a btree
|
||||
defines.SHRUB_SIZE = 0
|
||||
defines.INLINE_SIZE = 0
|
||||
defines.CRYSTAL_THRESH = -1
|
||||
defines.FRAGMENT_SIZE = 'BLOCK_SIZE/8'
|
||||
defines.SIZE = '2*FRAGMENT_SIZE'
|
||||
@@ -1956,7 +1956,7 @@ code = '''
|
||||
[cases.test_ck_ckfetches_btree]
|
||||
defines.BADBIT = -1
|
||||
# force the file to create a btree
|
||||
defines.SHRUB_SIZE = 0
|
||||
defines.INLINE_SIZE = 0
|
||||
defines.CRYSTAL_THRESH = -1
|
||||
defines.FRAGMENT_SIZE = 'BLOCK_SIZE/8'
|
||||
defines.SIZE = '2*FRAGMENT_SIZE'
|
||||
@@ -2213,7 +2213,7 @@ defines.BADBLOCK_BEHAVIOR = [
|
||||
'LFS_EMUBD_BADBLOCK_READFLIP',
|
||||
]
|
||||
# force the file to create a btree
|
||||
defines.SHRUB_SIZE = 0
|
||||
defines.INLINE_SIZE = 0
|
||||
defines.CRYSTAL_THRESH = -1
|
||||
defines.FRAGMENT_SIZE = 'BLOCK_SIZE/8'
|
||||
defines.SIZE = '2*FRAGMENT_SIZE'
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user