Github/littlefs
1
Fork 0
Code Actions Activity

Dropped internal LFS_i_UNTIDY pseudo-alias flag

Browse Source 
We really shouldn't have two names for the same thing, it just makes
things more confusing, even if the public name doesn't quite match the
internal usage. Especially now that we internally rely on these being
the same flag.

This renames LFS_i_UNTIDY -> LFS_I_MKCONSISTENT and drops the untidy/
mktidy naming internally.

No code changes.
This commit is contained in:
Christopher Haster
2025-01-18 02:52:55 -06:00
parent 8cfaacbfb6
commit a63b8e1527
5 changed files with 26 additions and 36 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
tests/test_forphans.toml
+4 -4
View File
@@ -5314,7 +5314,7 @@ code = '''
// we should have cleaned up all grms/orphans
assert(lfs.grm.mids[0] == -1);
assert(lfs.grm.mids[1] == -1);
assert(!(lfs.flags & LFS_i_UNTIDY));
assert(!(lfs.flags & LFS_I_MKCONSISTENT));
struct lfs_fsinfo fsinfo;
lfsr_fs_stat(&lfs, &fsinfo) => 0;
@@ -5450,7 +5450,7 @@ code = '''
// we should have cleaned up all grms/orphans
assert(lfs.grm.mids[0] == -1);
assert(lfs.grm.mids[1] == -1);
assert(!(lfs.flags & LFS_i_UNTIDY));
assert(!(lfs.flags & LFS_I_MKCONSISTENT));
struct lfs_fsinfo fsinfo;
lfsr_fs_stat(&lfs, &fsinfo) => 0;
@@ -5600,7 +5600,7 @@ code = '''
// we should have cleaned up all grms/orphans
assert(lfs.grm.mids[0] == -1);
assert(lfs.grm.mids[1] == -1);
assert(!(lfs.flags & LFS_i_UNTIDY));
assert(!(lfs.flags & LFS_I_MKCONSISTENT));
struct lfs_fsinfo fsinfo;
lfsr_fs_stat(&lfs, &fsinfo) => 0;
@@ -5756,7 +5756,7 @@ code = '''
// we should have cleaned up all grms/orphans
assert(lfs.grm.mids[0] == -1);
assert(lfs.grm.mids[1] == -1);
assert(!(lfs.flags & LFS_i_UNTIDY));
assert(!(lfs.flags & LFS_I_MKCONSISTENT));
struct lfs_fsinfo fsinfo;
lfsr_fs_stat(&lfs, &fsinfo) => 0;