Reintroduced LFSR_RATTR_BUF
Mainly just for self-documentation reasons. This may also make it easier to add LFSR_RATTR_BUF-specific asserts/ tweaks/etc, and helps future refactoring. But functionally LFSR_RATTR_BUF is equivalent to LFSR_RATTR for now. No code changes.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ code = '''
|
||||
|
||||
// add to btree
|
||||
lfsr_btree_commit(&lfs, &btree, bid, LFSR_RATTRS(
|
||||
LFSR_RATTR(
|
||||
LFSR_RATTR_BUF(
|
||||
LFSR_TAG_DATA, +1,
|
||||
&(uint8_t){'a'+(i % 26)}, 1))) => 0;
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1851,7 +1851,7 @@ code = '''
|
||||
|
||||
// add to btree
|
||||
lfsr_btree_commit(&lfs, &btree, bid, LFSR_RATTRS(
|
||||
LFSR_RATTR(
|
||||
LFSR_RATTR_BUF(
|
||||
LFSR_TAG_DATA, +1,
|
||||
&(uint8_t){'a'+(i % 26)}, 1))) => 0;
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -3626,7 +3626,7 @@ code = '''
|
||||
|
||||
// add to btree
|
||||
lfsr_btree_commit(&lfs, &btree, bid, LFSR_RATTRS(
|
||||
LFSR_RATTR(
|
||||
LFSR_RATTR_BUF(
|
||||
LFSR_TAG_DATA, +1,
|
||||
&(uint8_t){'a'+(i % 26)}, 1))) => 0;
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user