gc: Added more tests over info flags, dropped gc_flags default
Since we dropped lfsr_gc_setflags/setsteps, it was no longer possible to
set gc_flags to zero (perfectly valid and useful for system bringup/
testing things). Supporting gc_flags=0 means it's not possible to
provide a default, but this is probably ok as users need to opt-in to
LFS_GC anyways.
Note that at least gc_steps=0 doesn't make sense, so the default there
is reasonable.
Fixing this also highlighted that gc_flags/steps are no longer mutable,
making the comment in lfs_init out-of-date. Dropping these saves a bit
of lfs_t size, so that's nice.
And then testing also revealed that LFS_GC_CKDATA implying LFS_GC_CKDATA
means it should probably clear the LFS_I_CKMETA flag as well.
---
And here I thought this was going to be just a simple test-writing
exercise!
Code changes:
code stack ctx
default before: 37792 2608 620
default after: 37792 (-0.0%) 2608 (+0.0%) 620 (+0.0%)
gc before: 37896 2608 768
gc after: 37848 (-0.1%) 2608 (+0.0%) 760 (-1.0%)
This commit is contained in:
@@ -71,7 +71,8 @@ code = '''
|
||||
| ((!MKCONSISTENT) ? LFS_I_MKCONSISTENT : 0)
|
||||
| ((!LOOKAHEAD) ? LFS_I_LOOKAHEAD : 0)
|
||||
| ((!COMPACT) ? LFS_I_COMPACT : 0)
|
||||
| ((!CKMETA) ? LFS_I_CKMETA : 0)
|
||||
// note ckdata implies ckmeta
|
||||
| ((!CKMETA && !CKDATA) ? LFS_I_CKMETA : 0)
|
||||
| ((!CKDATA) ? LFS_I_CKDATA : 0)));
|
||||
|
||||
lfsr_unmount(&lfs) => 0;
|
||||
@@ -144,7 +145,8 @@ code = '''
|
||||
assert(fsinfo.flags == (
|
||||
LFS_I_MKCONSISTENT
|
||||
| LFS_I_COMPACT
|
||||
| ((!CKMETA) ? LFS_I_CKMETA : 0)
|
||||
// note ckdata implies ckmeta
|
||||
| ((!CKMETA && !CKDATA) ? LFS_I_CKMETA : 0)
|
||||
| ((!CKDATA) ? LFS_I_CKDATA : 0)));
|
||||
lfsr_unmount(&lfs) => 0;
|
||||
'''
|
||||
@@ -215,7 +217,8 @@ code = '''
|
||||
assert(fsinfo.flags == (
|
||||
LFS_I_MKCONSISTENT
|
||||
| ((!LOOKAHEAD) ? LFS_I_LOOKAHEAD : 0)
|
||||
| ((!CKMETA) ? LFS_I_CKMETA : 0)
|
||||
// note ckdata implies ckmeta
|
||||
| ((!CKMETA && !CKDATA) ? LFS_I_CKMETA : 0)
|
||||
| ((!CKDATA) ? LFS_I_CKDATA : 0)));
|
||||
|
||||
// mdir should have been compacted
|
||||
@@ -314,7 +317,8 @@ code = '''
|
||||
assert(fsinfo.flags == (
|
||||
((!LOOKAHEAD) ? LFS_I_LOOKAHEAD : 0)
|
||||
| ((!COMPACT) ? LFS_I_COMPACT : 0)
|
||||
| ((!CKMETA) ? LFS_I_CKMETA : 0)
|
||||
// note ckdata implies ckmeta
|
||||
| ((!CKMETA && !CKDATA) ? LFS_I_CKMETA : 0)
|
||||
| ((!CKDATA) ? LFS_I_CKDATA : 0)));
|
||||
|
||||
// check we can still read the files
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user