Mention that shrinking is unlikely to work
This commit is contained in:
@@ -531,6 +531,7 @@ defines.BLOCK_COUNT = 'ERASE_COUNT'
|
||||
defines.BLOCK_COUNT_2 = ['ERASE_COUNT/2', 'ERASE_COUNT/4', '2']
|
||||
defines.KNOWN_BLOCK_COUNT = [true, false]
|
||||
code = '''
|
||||
#ifdef LFS_SHRINKIFCHEAP
|
||||
lfs_t lfs;
|
||||
lfs_format(&lfs, cfg) => 0;
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -628,6 +629,7 @@ code = '''
|
||||
lfs_file_close(&lfs, &file) => 0;
|
||||
assert(memcmp(buffer, "hello!", 6) == 0);
|
||||
lfs_unmount(&lfs) => 0;
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
'''
|
||||
|
||||
# test that metadata_max does not cause problems for superblock compaction
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user