emubd: Renamed LFS_EMUBD_POWERLOSS_NOOP -> LFS_EMUBD_POWERLOSS_ATOMIC
Mainly to avoid ambiguity with PROGNOOP/ERASENOOP and make it clear emubd still simulates powerloss, but also because I think the name sounds cooler.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ after = [
|
||||
#
|
||||
[cases.test_powerloss_spam_dir_many]
|
||||
defines.POWERLOSS_BEHAVIOR = [
|
||||
'LFS_EMUBD_POWERLOSS_NOOP',
|
||||
'LFS_EMUBD_POWERLOSS_ATOMIC',
|
||||
'LFS_EMUBD_POWERLOSS_SOMEBITS',
|
||||
'LFS_EMUBD_POWERLOSS_MOSTBITS',
|
||||
'LFS_EMUBD_POWERLOSS_OOO',
|
||||
@@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ code = '''
|
||||
#
|
||||
[cases.test_powerloss_spam_file_many]
|
||||
defines.POWERLOSS_BEHAVIOR = [
|
||||
'LFS_EMUBD_POWERLOSS_NOOP',
|
||||
'LFS_EMUBD_POWERLOSS_ATOMIC',
|
||||
'LFS_EMUBD_POWERLOSS_SOMEBITS',
|
||||
'LFS_EMUBD_POWERLOSS_MOSTBITS',
|
||||
'LFS_EMUBD_POWERLOSS_OOO',
|
||||
@@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ code = '''
|
||||
#
|
||||
[cases.test_powerloss_spam_f_pl_fuzz]
|
||||
defines.POWERLOSS_BEHAVIOR = [
|
||||
'LFS_EMUBD_POWERLOSS_NOOP',
|
||||
'LFS_EMUBD_POWERLOSS_ATOMIC',
|
||||
'LFS_EMUBD_POWERLOSS_SOMEBITS',
|
||||
'LFS_EMUBD_POWERLOSS_MOSTBITS',
|
||||
'LFS_EMUBD_POWERLOSS_OOO',
|
||||
@@ -451,7 +451,7 @@ code = '''
|
||||
#
|
||||
[cases.test_powerloss_spam_fd_pl_fuzz]
|
||||
defines.POWERLOSS_BEHAVIOR = [
|
||||
'LFS_EMUBD_POWERLOSS_NOOP',
|
||||
'LFS_EMUBD_POWERLOSS_ATOMIC',
|
||||
'LFS_EMUBD_POWERLOSS_SOMEBITS',
|
||||
'LFS_EMUBD_POWERLOSS_MOSTBITS',
|
||||
'LFS_EMUBD_POWERLOSS_OOO',
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user