emubd: Renamed LFS_EMUBD_POWERLOSS_NOOP -> LFS_EMUBD_POWERLOSS_ATOMIC

Mainly to avoid ambiguity with PROGNOOP/ERASENOOP and make it clear
emubd still simulates powerloss, but also because I think the name
sounds cooler.
This commit is contained in:
Christopher Haster
2025-01-16 14:37:39 -06:00
parent 47438a8c46
commit 66f5fa152a
4 changed files with 7 additions and 7 deletions
+4 -4
View File
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ after = [
#
[cases.test_powerloss_spam_dir_many]
defines.POWERLOSS_BEHAVIOR = [
'LFS_EMUBD_POWERLOSS_NOOP',
'LFS_EMUBD_POWERLOSS_ATOMIC',
'LFS_EMUBD_POWERLOSS_SOMEBITS',
'LFS_EMUBD_POWERLOSS_MOSTBITS',
'LFS_EMUBD_POWERLOSS_OOO',
@@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ code = '''
#
[cases.test_powerloss_spam_file_many]
defines.POWERLOSS_BEHAVIOR = [
'LFS_EMUBD_POWERLOSS_NOOP',
'LFS_EMUBD_POWERLOSS_ATOMIC',
'LFS_EMUBD_POWERLOSS_SOMEBITS',
'LFS_EMUBD_POWERLOSS_MOSTBITS',
'LFS_EMUBD_POWERLOSS_OOO',
@@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ code = '''
#
[cases.test_powerloss_spam_f_pl_fuzz]
defines.POWERLOSS_BEHAVIOR = [
'LFS_EMUBD_POWERLOSS_NOOP',
'LFS_EMUBD_POWERLOSS_ATOMIC',
'LFS_EMUBD_POWERLOSS_SOMEBITS',
'LFS_EMUBD_POWERLOSS_MOSTBITS',
'LFS_EMUBD_POWERLOSS_OOO',
@@ -451,7 +451,7 @@ code = '''
#
[cases.test_powerloss_spam_fd_pl_fuzz]
defines.POWERLOSS_BEHAVIOR = [
'LFS_EMUBD_POWERLOSS_NOOP',
'LFS_EMUBD_POWERLOSS_ATOMIC',
'LFS_EMUBD_POWERLOSS_SOMEBITS',
'LFS_EMUBD_POWERLOSS_MOSTBITS',
'LFS_EMUBD_POWERLOSS_OOO',