From 26f303481384cea953d4377ffb5e238f39bffe20 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Christopher Haster <geky@geky.net>
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2024 23:35:33 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Fixed outdated numbers in crc32c comment

This number was an incorrect result caued by overallocating the
small-table array (64-ints vs 64-bytes), and has unfortunately crept
into too many places...
---
 lfs_util.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/lfs_util.c b/lfs_util.c
index 4b1a1f23..4793c01b 100644
--- a/lfs_util.c
+++ b/lfs_util.c
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ uint32_t lfs_crc32c(uint32_t crc, const void *buffer, size_t size) {
     //
     //                code   stack     ins   ld/st  branch
     // naive            48      12  221192    4099   36865
-    // small-table     316      12   49160   12291    4097
+    // small-table     124      12   49160   12291    4097
     // big-table      1064       8   32776    8195    4097
     //
     #if defined(LFS_SMALLER_CRC32C)