Adopted erase_size config changes in block devices and test runners

This ended up needing a bit of API rework since littlefs no longer needs
to know the actual erase_count. We can no longer rely on lfs_config to
contain all the information necessary to configure the block devices.

Changing the lfs_bd_config structs to be required is probably a good
idea anyways as it moves us more towards separating the bds from
littlefs, though we can't quite get rid of the lfs_config parameter
because of the block-device API in lfs_config. Eventually it would be
nice to get rid of it, but that would require API breakage.
This commit is contained in:
Christopher Haster
2022-11-11 15:05:34 -06:00
parent c16120bf5f
commit 21e54ee458
15 changed files with 303 additions and 203 deletions
+3 -3
View File
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
if = '(int32_t)BLOCK_CYCLES == -1'
[cases.test_badblocks_single]
defines.BLOCK_COUNT = 256 # small bd so test runs faster
defines.ERASE_COUNT = 256 # small bd so test runs faster
defines.ERASE_CYCLES = 0xffffffff
defines.ERASE_VALUE = [0x00, 0xff, -1]
defines.BADBLOCK_BEHAVIOR = [
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ code = '''
'''
[cases.test_badblocks_region_corruption] # (causes cascading failures)
defines.BLOCK_COUNT = 256 # small bd so test runs faster
defines.ERASE_COUNT = 256 # small bd so test runs faster
defines.ERASE_CYCLES = 0xffffffff
defines.ERASE_VALUE = [0x00, 0xff, -1]
defines.BADBLOCK_BEHAVIOR = [
@@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ code = '''
'''
[cases.test_badblocks_alternating_corruption] # (causes cascading failures)
defines.BLOCK_COUNT = 256 # small bd so test runs faster
defines.ERASE_COUNT = 256 # small bd so test runs faster
defines.ERASE_CYCLES = 0xffffffff
defines.ERASE_VALUE = [0x00, 0xff, -1]
defines.BADBLOCK_BEHAVIOR = [