Adopted erase_size config changes in block devices and test runners

This ended up needing a bit of API rework since littlefs no longer needs
to know the actual erase_count. We can no longer rely on lfs_config to
contain all the information necessary to configure the block devices.

Changing the lfs_bd_config structs to be required is probably a good
idea anyways as it moves us more towards separating the bds from
littlefs, though we can't quite get rid of the lfs_config parameter
because of the block-device API in lfs_config. Eventually it would be
nice to get rid of it, but that would require API breakage.
This commit is contained in:
Christopher Haster
2022-11-11 15:05:34 -06:00
parent c16120bf5f
commit 21e54ee458
15 changed files with 303 additions and 203 deletions
+13 -5
View File
@@ -67,6 +67,18 @@ typedef int64_t lfs_emubd_ssleep_t;
// emubd config, this is required for testing
struct lfs_emubd_config {
// Minimum size of a read operation in bytes.
lfs_size_t read_size;
// Minimum size of a program operation in bytes.
lfs_size_t prog_size;
// Size of an erase operation in bytes.
lfs_size_t erase_size;
// Number of erase blocks on the device.
lfs_size_t erase_count;
// 8-bit erase value to use for simulating erases. -1 does not simulate
// erases, which can speed up testing by avoiding the extra block-device
// operations to store the erase value.
@@ -149,11 +161,7 @@ typedef struct lfs_emubd {
/// Block device API ///
// Create an emulating block device using the geometry in lfs_config
//
// Note that filebd is used if a path is provided, if path is NULL
// emubd will use rambd which can be much faster.
int lfs_emubd_create(const struct lfs_config *cfg, const char *path);
int lfs_emubd_createcfg(const struct lfs_config *cfg, const char *path,
int lfs_emubd_create(const struct lfs_config *cfg,
const struct lfs_emubd_config *bdcfg);
// Clean up memory associated with block device